Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Nasal Radix Augmentation in Rhinoplasty: Suggestion of an Algorithm Publisher Pubmed



Bohluli B1, 2 ; Varedi P2, 3 ; Bagheri SC4, 5, 6, 7 ; Rezazade M8
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Craniomaxillofacial Research Centre, Buali Hospital, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Craniomaxillofacial Research Centre, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran
  4. 4. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Northside Hospital, Atlanta, GA, United States
  5. 5. Private Practice, Georgia Oral and Facial Surgery, Marietta, GA, United States
  6. 6. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA, United States
  7. 7. Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States
  8. 8. Faculty of Dentistry, Islamic Azad University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Source: International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Published:2017


Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate four standard techniques for radix augmentation during primary rhinoplasty: Skoog, crushed septal cartilage, temporalis fascia, and crushed cartilage wrapped in temporalis fascia. The main criterion for a patient to be included in this study was the need for radix augmentation, which was determined through preoperative evaluations. All patients requiring total dorsal augmentation were excluded from the study. This study included 63 rhinoplasty patients who underwent radix augmentation. The Skoog technique was applied in 15 patients, crushed septal cartilage in 16, temporalis fascia in 17, and crushed cartilage wrapped in temporalis fascia in 15. In those undergoing the Skoog technique, sharp edges of graft were palpable in three patients and were even visible in one patient. In the crushed cartilage group, seven patients showed irregularities during the postoperative follow-up. The results of this study indicate that all four autologous grafts represent acceptable graft material for radix augmentation. The algorithm suggests using the easier techniques first and that secondary donor sites should be considered only when the ideal result is not achieved. © 2016 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons