Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Clinical Prognostic Value of the Smyd2/3 As New Epigenetic Biomarkers in Solid Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Publisher Pubmed



Razmi M1, 2 ; Yazdanpanah A3 ; Etemadmoghadam S1 ; Alaeddini M1 ; Angelini S4 ; Eini L1, 5
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Dental Research Center, Dentistry Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Oncopathology Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Department of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  4. 4. Department of Pharmacy and Biotechnology (Fabit), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
  5. 5. Division of Histology, Department of Basic Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Source: Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics Published:2022


Abstract

Background: SET and MYND domain-containing protein (SMYD) family with methyltransferase activity is involved in cancer progression. This novel meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the association of SMYD family with the clinical and survival outcomes in solid cancer patients. Methods: We systematically searched Embase, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science to select relevant articles. Hazard ratios (HRs), odds ratios (ORs), and 95% confidence intervals were extracted. Heterogeneity was evaluated by chi-square-based Q and I2 tests, while publication bias by funnel plots and Egger’s test. Results: Thirty-two articles (4,826 patients) met inclusion criteria. SMYD2/3 overexpression was statistically associated with poor overall survival (HR = 1.794, P < 0.001), disease/relapse/progression-free survival (HR = 2.114, P < 0.001), disease/cancer-specific survival (HR = 3.220, P = 0.003), larger tumor size (OR = 1.963, P < 0.001), advanced TNM stage (OR = 2.066, P < 0.001), lymph node metastasis (OR = 2.054, P < 0.001), and distant metastasis (OR = 1.978, P = 0.004). Subgroup analysis showed more significant association between SMYD2 overexpression and reduced survival outcomes than that in SMYD3. Conversely, the relationship between SMYD3 and various clinicopathologic factors was stronger compared to SMYD2. Conclusion: Enhanced SMYD2/3 expression may be an unfavorable clinical prognostic factor in different solid cancer types. © 2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.