Effect of Socks Structures on Plantar Dynamic Pressure Distribution Publisher Pubmed



Soltanzadeh Z¹ ; Shaikhzadeh Najar S² ; Haghpanahi M³ ; Mohajeritehrani MR⁴ Show Affiliations
Source: Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers# Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine Published:2016

Abstract

A major purpose of investigating the plantar pressure in patients with pain or those at risk for skin injury is to reduce the pressure below metatarsal heads, specially first and second metatarsal heads. The aim of this article is to evaluate the effects of the socks structures on the changes in plantar dynamic pressure. In this study, seven socks types with different structures for the sole area were produced. The Gaitview® AFA-50 system, a force plate, was used to measure the plantar dynamic pressure of 10 participants. The barefoot plantar dynamic pressure distribution was compared with the plantar dynamic pressure distribution with socks by two independent samples test on various zones of the foot and on different genders using SPSS software. Mann-Whitney tests were used to determine specific significant differences. The obtained results showed that the main trend was to redistribute the plantar dynamic pressure from the higher plantar pressure zones (toe and first through forth metatarsal bone regions) were decreased and as a result the plantar pressure toward the relatively lower pressure zones (fifth metatarsal bone and midfoot regions). In comparison with the barefoot condition, the cross miss structure reduced the mean pressure in the critical region of the foot (first metatarsal) for male and female subjects (p < 0.05) and also the mock rib structure reduced the mean pressure for female subjects (p < 0.05). In general, the results suggested wearing the socks because the socks make the plantar pressure redistributed from high to low plantar pressure zones. The results of this research indicated that wearing socks with cross miss and mock rib structures will reduce the mean plantar pressure values in forefoot area in comparison with the barefoot condition. © 2016 Institution of Mechanical Engineers.