Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Antibiotic Stewardship Program in Intensive Care Unit: First Report From Iran Publisher



Vahidi G1 ; Mohammadi M2 ; Shojaei L3 ; Ramezani M2 ; Jafari S4 ; Khalili H1
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Enghelab Ave, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Intensive Care Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  4. 4. Department of Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Source: International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science Published:2018


Abstract

Introduction: Few data regarding antibiotic stewardship programs in critically ill patients are available. In the present study, the consequence of changing an empirical antibiotic regimen from a carbapenem (meropenem) to a noncarbapenem antibiotic (piperacillin-tazobactam) was evaluated in critically ill patients with a suspicion of sepsis. Methods: This open-label randomized clinical trial was conducted during May 2015-January 2017 at the general Intensive Care Unit of the Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran, Iran. In this study, a carbapenem (meropenem) or a noncarbapenem (piperacillin-tazobactam) antibiotic was considered as an empirical antibiotic regimen in 100 critically ill patients with a suspicion of sepsis. Clinical response and bacterial eradication were defined as primary and secondary outcomes of the study, respectively. Chi-square, Mann-Whitney, and independent sample t-tests were used for comparing variables between the groups. ANOVA was used to compare changes in the mean differences of parameters between the groups. Meaningful difference was indicated as P ≤ 0.05. Results: During the first 72 h of the antibiotic course, the number of patients with clinical response was comparable between piperacillin-tazobactam and meropenem groups (21 [42%] and 25 [50%], respectively, P = 0.31). Also, at this time, microbial eradication occurred in 13 (54.16%) and 9 (40.90%) patients in piperacillin-tazobactam and meropenem groups, respectively (P = 0.67). Conclusions: Using a carbapenem (meropenem) instead of a noncarbapenem (piperacillin-tazobactam) as an empirical antibiotic regimen did not affect clinical response and bacterial eradication rates in critically ill patients with a suspicion of sepsis. © 2018 International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow.