Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Practical Nuclear Medicine and Utility of Phantoms for Internal Dosimetry: Xcat Compared With Zubal Publisher Pubmed



Fallahpoor M1 ; Abbasi M1 ; Kalantari F2 ; Parach AA3 ; Sen A4
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Vali-Asr Hospital, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, 1419731351, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, 75235, TX, United States
  3. 3. Department of Medical Physics, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
  4. 4. Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, 77004, TX, United States

Source: Radiation Protection Dosimetry Published:2017


Abstract

Purpose: The absorbed doses for two radioisotopes, 99mTc and 131I, between previously validated Zubal phantom and the recently developed XCAT phantom were compared. Materials and methods: GATE Monte Carlo code was used to simulate the statistical process of radiation. A XCAT phantom with voxel and matrix sizes similar to a standard Zubal phantom was generated. According to Medical International Radiation Dose formalism, specific absorbed fraction (SAF) values for photons and S-factors for beta particles were tabulated. The amounts of absorbed doses were calculated and compared in different organs. Results: The differences of gamma radiation doses, SAFs, between Zubal and XCAT are >50% in adrenal from adrenal, pancreas from pancreas and thyroid from thyroid, in lung from kidney, kidneys from lungs and in kidneys from thyroid and thyroid from kidneys. The beta radiation doses differences between Zubal and XCAT are >50% in thyroid from thyroid, bladder from bladder, kidney from kidney, liver from bladder, thyroid from bladder and kidney from thyroid. The size and distances of the organs were different between XCAT and Zubal phantoms. Denoted differences of SAF and S-factors correspond to the different organ geometries in phantoms. Conclusion: The results of absorbed doses in Zubal and XCAT phantoms are different. The variations prohibit easy comparison or interchangeability of dosimetry between these phantoms. © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.