Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Development and Psychometric Evaluation of Perceived Clinical Nurses’ Professional Dignity Scale: A Sequential-Exploratory Mixed-Method Study Publisher



Khachian A1 ; Ebadi A2, 3 ; Mardanihamooleh M4 ; Bagheri H5 ; Abbasi A5
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, Department of Medical Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Behavioral Sciences Research Center, Lifestyle Institute, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Nursing Faculty, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  4. 4. Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, Department of Psychiatric Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  5. 5. Department of Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran

Source: BMC Nursing Published:2023


Abstract

Background: In recent years, one of the concepts that has received attention in the nursing profession is professional dignity. On the other hand, there was no proper scale to evaluate this concept. This study aimed to develop and evaluate the psychometric properties of perceived clinical nurses’ professional dignity scale (PCNPDS). Methods: This exploratory sequential mixed method was developed and implemented in Iran. The study was conducted in two phases; (a) item generation by hybrid concept analysis and (b) item reduction by psychometric evaluation including validity and reliability of the developed scale. Also, the interpretability (ceiling and floor effect), stability (intraclass correlation coefficient), and absolute stability (standard error of measurement) were calculated. Results: 68 items in the primary item pool were finally reduced to 22 items after evaluating the validity (face, content, and construct validity) and reliability. Exploratory factor analysis revealed three factors (organizational dignity, dignity-based competency, and dignity-based appreciation) and explained 47.55% of the total extracted variance. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the model had a good fit. Finally, Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, McDonald’s omega, ICC, and SEM were calculated as 0.90, 0.89, 0.96, and 1.91, respectively. Conclusion: The 22-item developed scale is valid and reliable for professional dignity measurement among Iranian clinical nurses. © 2023, BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
Other Related Docs
15. Development and Validation of the Coping With Multiple Sclerosis Questionnaire, Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders (2017)
18. The Ethical Attitude of Dentists Scale: Development and Psychometric Properties, Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine (2022)