Adjustment Formulae to Improve the Correlation of White-To-White Measurement With Direct Measurement of the Ciliary Sulcus Diameter by Ultrasound Biomicroscopy Publisher



Hashemian SJ¹ ; Mohebbi M¹ ; Yaseri M² ; Jafari ME¹ ; Nabili S³ ; Hashemian SM⁴ ; Hashemian MS⁵ Show Affiliations
Source: Journal of Current Ophthalmology Published:2018

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluates the correlation between horizontal white-to-white (WTW) distance using Caliper and Orbscan IIz with the ciliary sulcus diameter measured by high frequency ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) and presents an adjustment formula to improve the correlation. Methods: We measured horizontal sulcus-to-sulcus (STS) dimension of 273 right eyes of 273 high myopic patients with 35 MHz UBM and horizontal WTW using Orbscan IIz and Caliper. Mean WTW diameter, differences, and the correlation of measurement methods were evaluated. Results: The mean spherical equivalent was −8.79 ± 4.87 diopters. Mean horizontal STS dimension with UBM was 12.13 ± 0.45 mm (range, 10.81–13.42 mm). Mean WTW diameter in the Caliper method was 11.70 ± 0.40 mm (range, 10.6–12.8 mm) and 11.70 ± 0.40 mm (range, 10.5–13.1 mm) in the Orbscan method. Mean difference of UBM STS and WTW with Caliper was 0.48 ± 0.28 mm (range, −0.19 to 1.37 mm). Mean difference of UBM STS diameter and Orbscan WTW was 0.38 ± 0.31 mm (range, −0.64 to 1.29 mm). The Pearson correlations of WTW diameter measured by Caliper and Orbscan with UBM's STS diameter were 0.778 and 0.773, respectively. This difference diminished after adjustment. The 95% limit of agreement was almost the same in Caliper and Orbscan (−0.07 to 1.03 compared with −0.23 to 0.99). Conclusion: There is a significant difference in measurements between STS diameter using UBM and WTW diameter utilizing Caliper and Orbscan. This difference diminished after our recommended adjustment. © 2017 Iranian Society of Ophthalmology