Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Evaluation of Health Risk Experienced by Urban Taxi Drivers to Whole-Body Vibration and Multiple Shocks Publisher



Salehi Sahlabadi A1 ; Azrah K2, 3 ; Mehrifar Y4 ; Poursadeghiyan M5
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Environmental and Occupational Hazards Control Research Center, Department of Occupational Health and Safety at Work, School of Public Health and Safety, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Occupational Health, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Department of Occupational Health, School of Public Health, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam, Iran
  4. 4. Students Research Committee, Department of Occupational Health and Safety at Work, School of Public Health and Safety, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  5. 5. Department of Occupational Health, School of Health, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran

Source: Noise and Vibration Worldwide Published:2024


Abstract

This cross-sectional study was done aiming at determining the exposure of taxi drivers to vibration on 35 safe taxis (19 cars with engine volume of 1.325 L, 9 cars with engine volume of 1.645 L, and 7 cars with engine volume of 1.761 L). Measurements were based on ‘ISO 2631-1’ on seats’ pans, by Castel GA2005 vibrometer. The results through two different evaluative methods indicated moderate exposure levels, corresponding to suggestive Health Guidance Caution Zone (HGCZ) in ‘ISO 2631-1’. Evaluation of exposure to the WBV among taxi drivers, in the taxis with low and high mean acceleration values, using the VDV method is preferred over the R.M.S method. In lower accelerations, in all conditions, the mean of the reckoned values in the VDV method was less than the R.M.S method, and in higher accelerations, where there are more differences, and the CF values were higher (PAIK 1761 cars), again the assessed mean duration in the VDV method is less than R.M.S method. In higher accelerations and with fewer crest factors, this matter didn’t hold, and the allowed time in the R.M.S method became lower. © The Author(s) 2024.
Related Docs
Experts (# of related papers)