Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Mobile Applications for Hemodialysis: Evaluation Using the Mobile App Rating Scale (Mars) Publisher Pubmed



Esmaeeli E1 ; Khorashadizadeh M2 ; Rahmani M3
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Health Information Management and Medical Informatics, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Health Information Management Department, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Health Information Management, Department of Health Information Technology, Saveh University of Medical Sciences, Saveh, Iran

Source: Seminars in Dialysis Published:2025


Abstract

Introduction: Mobile applications (apps) and social media could be useful in improving the condition of patients on hemodialysis. Despite the rise of mobile health apps in hemodialysis management, no research has evaluated the quality of these apps with reliable tools. This study aimed to evaluate the quality of apps designed for the self-care of patients on hemodialysis. Materials and Methods: A review of Google Play and App Store mobile platforms was carried out to evaluate the mobile apps used for hemodialysis. These apps were assessed using the mobile application rating scale (MARS), which includes criteria for overall quality, engagement, functionality, aesthetics, and information. Search keywords included “Dialysis,” “Kidney Dialysis,” “Hemodialysis,” “Haemodialysis,” and “Peritoneal Dialysis.” Eligibility criteria included being related to dialysis, being designed specifically for patients, being free, being available in English, and being developed for Android and iOS platforms. The included apps were independently evaluated and rated by two reviewers using MARS. Results: Initially, 177 apps were identified, and after the screening and review processes, six apps were selected for qualitative evaluation. The overall scores on MARS varied from 2.33 to 3.67. The “KidneyPal: Kidney Disease Mgmt” app received the highest scores in most MARS items. Moreover, the maximum app quality mean score belonged to “KidneyPal: Kidney Disease Mgmt” (4.26 out of 5). Conclusion: The findings showed a limited number of apps available for hemodialysis, the majority of which were of low quality. The reviewed apps performed well in functionality but obtained lower scores in terms of app subjective quality. Future studies should focus on developing and testing mobile apps using assessment tools, such as MARS, as well as evaluating their impact on health behaviors and outcomes. © 2025 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Related Docs
1. The Persian Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (Mars-Fa): Translation and Validation Study, JMIR Formative Research (2022)
2. Quality Evaluation of English Mobile Applications for Gestational Diabetes: App Review Using Mobile Application Rating Scale (Mars), Current Diabetes Reviews (2021)
3. The Most Used Questionnaires for Evaluating the Usability of Robots and Smart Wearables: A Scoping Review, Digital Health (2024)
4. Criteria for Assessing the Quality of Mhealth Apps: A Systematic Review, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (2018)
5. Evaluation of M-Health Applications Use in Epilepsy: A Systematic Review, Iranian Journal of Public Health (2021)
6. Body Mass Index and All-Cause Mortality in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Dose–Response Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies, Journal of Renal Nutrition (2017)
Experts (# of related papers)
View all Related Experts
Sharareh Rostam Niakan Kalhori (2)
Marjan Ghazisaeedi (2)