Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Sarcopenia Screening Strategies in Older People: A Cost Effectiveness Analysis in Iran Publisher Pubmed



Darvishi A1, 2 ; Hemami MR3 ; Shafiee G1 ; Daroudi R2, 4 ; Mohseni M2 ; Shekarabi FH5 ; Heshmat R1
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Chronic Diseases Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Population Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), NO 10, Jalale-Al-Ahmad Ave, Chamran Highway, Tehran, 1411713137, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Health Management and Economics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Poursina AVE, Tehran, 1417613151, Iran
  3. 3. Aberdeen Centre for Health Data Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Foresthill, Aberdeen, AB252ZD, United Kingdom
  4. 4. National Center for Health Insurance Research, Iran Health Insurance Organization, Tehran, Iran
  5. 5. Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Sciences, Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University, Lavizan, Tehran, 1417613363, Iran

Source: BMC Public Health Published:2021


Abstract

Background and objectives: Sarcopenia is an important age-related disease which can lead to an increased risk of mortality, falls, fractures, and poor quality of life. So, timely detection can be effective in reducing the burden of disease. The aim of this study was to identify the most cost-effective strategy for sarcopenia screening in Iran. Materials and methods: We constructed a Markov transition model over a life-time horizon based on natural history. Compared strategies included Sarcopenia scoring assessment models (SarSA-Mod), European working group on sarcopenia in older people (EWGSOP), Mini sarcopenia risk assessment (MSRA) and SARC-F. Parameters values were extracted from primary data and the literature, and the costs and Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were calculated for each strategy. Sensitivity analysis of uncertain parameters was also performed to determine the robustness of the model. Analysis was performed using 2020 version of TreeAge Pro software. Results: All four screening strategies increased life time QALYs. After removing dominated strategy, the incremental cost per QALY gained for sarcopenia screening varied from $1875.67 for EWGSOP to $1898.33 for MSRA. Our base-case analysis showed that the most cost-effective strategy was EWGSOP and 2nd best was SarSA-Mod with $43,414.3 and $42,663.3 net monetary benefits given one GDP per capita ($5520.311) as willingness to pay, respectively. Sensitivity analysis of model parameters also showed robustness of results. Conclusions: The results of the study, as the first economic evaluation of sarcopenia screening, showed that the EWGSOP strategy is more cost-effective than other strategies. © 2021, The Author(s).
Other Related Docs
16. Sarcopenia and Planning to Management: Review Article, Tehran University Medical Journal (2021)
25. Ethical Considerations in Sarcopenia Research, Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine (2023)
32. The Economic Burden of Osteoporosis in Iran in 2020, Osteoporosis International (2022)
38. The Association Between Sarcopenic Obesity (So) and Major Dietary Patterns in Overweight and Obese Adult Women, Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research and Reviews (2019)