Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Acute Physical and Psychological Stress Effects on Visceral Hypersensitivity in Male Rat: Role of Central Nucleus of the Amygdala; [Efeitos Agudos Do Estresse Fisico E Psicologico Na Hipersensibilidade Visceral Em Rato Macho: Papel Do Nucleo Central Da Amidala] Publisher



Afzali H1 ; Nabavizadeh F1 ; Karimian SM1 ; Sohanaki H1 ; Vahedian J2, 3 ; Mohamadi SM2, 3
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Tehran University of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Department of Physiology, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Iran University of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Department of Physiology, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Iran University of Medical Sciences, Firouzgar Hospital, Department of Surgery, Tehran, Iran

Source: Journal of Coloproctology Published:2017


Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of acute physical and psychological stress and temporary central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA) block on stress-induced visceral hypersensitivity. Methods: Forty two male Wistar rats were used in this study. Animals were divided into 7 groups (n = 6); 1 – Control, 2 – physical stress, 3 – psychological stress, 4 – sham, 5 – lidocaine, 6 – lidocaine + physical stress and 7 – lidocaine + psychological stress. Stress induction was done using a communication box. Results: Abdominal withdrawal reflex (AWR) score was monitored one hour after stress exposure. AWR score significantly heightened at 20, 40 and 60 mmHg in the psychological stress group compared with control (p < 0.05), while, it was almost unchanged in other groups. This score was strikingly decreased at 20, 40 and 60 mmHg in lidocaine + psychological stress group compared with psychological stress with no tangible response on physical stress. Total stool weight was significantly increased in psychological stress group compared with control (0.72 ± 0.15, 0.1 ± 0.06 g) (p < 0.05), but it did not change in physical stress compared to control group (0.16 ± 0.12, 0.1 ± 0.06 g) (p < 0.05). Concomitant use of lidocaine with stress followed the same results in psychological groups (0.18 ± 0.2, 0.72 ± 0.15 g) (p < 0.05), while it did not have any effect on physical stress group (0.25 ± 0.1, 0.16 ± 0.12 g) (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Psychological stress could strongly affect visceral hypersensitivity. This effect is statistically comparable with physical stress. Temporary CeA block could also reduce visceral hypersensitivity post-acute psychological stress. © 2017 Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda.