Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Evaluation of Conventional Wastewater Treatment Plants Efficiency to Remove Microplastics in Terms of Abundance, Size, Shape, and Type: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Publisher Pubmed



Azizi N1 ; Nasseri S1 ; Nodehi RN1 ; Jaafarzadeh N2 ; Pirsaheb M3, 4
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Environmental Technologies Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
  3. 3. Department of Environmental Health Engineering, Faculty of Health, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
  4. 4. Research Center for Environmental Determinants of Health (RCEDH), Health Institute, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran

Source: Marine Pollution Bulletin Published:2022


Abstract

In the present study Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed as electronic databases were used to find work published up to October 27, 2020 about microplastics evaluation in conventional wastewater treatment plants. In total, 407 publications were found, of which 77 were eligible for meta-analysis. A comprehensive meta-analysis was undertaken to evaluate the relevant publications regarding microplastics abundance. The average microplastics abundance was within the 1–31,400, 0.2–12,580, 0.002–7863, and 0.003–447 items range per liter wastewater for influent, primary, secondary, and tertiary treatment steps, respectively. The difference between the abundance of microplastics characterization for the different treatment steps was analyzed using ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis test (depending on the data distribution). According to the pooled data, the average microplastics abundance was 124.04, 20.67, 5.62, and 1.97 (items/l) for influent, primary, secondary, and tertiary treatment. The results of Egger's test (t = 7.49, P ≤ 0.0001) were statistically significant, suggesting the existence of publication bias. © 2022 Elsevier Ltd