Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
In Vitro Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Metal Brackets to Aged Composite Using a Self-Adhesive Composite: Effect of Surface Conditioning and Different Bonding Agents Publisher Pubmed



Valizadeh S1, 2 ; Alimohammadi G3 ; Nik TH4 ; Etemadi A1, 5 ; Tanbakuchi B1, 4
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Laser Research Center of Dentistry, Dentistry Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Restorative Department, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  4. 4. Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  5. 5. Department of Periodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Source: International Orthodontics Published:2020


Abstract

Objectives: Bracket bonding to composite surfaces is increasing. This study sought to assess the effect of different adhesives (acid etchant + Transbond XT™, acid etchant + Vertise Flow™, Vertise Flow™) with different surface treatments (no preparation, bur, sandblasting, Er:YAG laser) on shear bond strength (SBS) of metal brackets to aged composite. Materials and methods: In this in vitro, experimental study, Filtek™ Z250 composite discs were fabricated (10 × 4 mm). After thermocycling (10,000 cycles between 5–55 °C), the samples were randomly divided into three groups (n = 48) based on the type of adhesive namely acid etchant + Transbond XT™, Vertise Flow™, and acid etchant + Vertise Flow™. Samples in each group were randomly divided into four subgroups (n = 12) based on the surface treatment including no-treatment, diamond bur, sandblasting and Er:YAG laser. Samples in each group were randomly divided into three subgroups (n = 12) based on the type of adhesive namely acid etchant + Transbond XT™, Vertise Flow™, and acid etchant + Vertise Flow™. After bracket bonding to composite discs, the samples underwent thermocycling (5000 cycles between 5–55 °C), and their SBS was measured in a universal testing machine. The samples were then inspected under a stereomicroscope at x10 magnification to determine their mode of failure and adhesive remnant index (ARI). Results: No significant difference was noted in SBS between adhesives in no-preparation and laser groups (P > 0.05). In all adhesive groups, sandblast had highest SBS, but it was not significantly different in Vertise Flow™ groups, with and without etching. The SBS provided by acid etchant + Transbond XT™ was significantly higher than that of the other two adhesives (P < 0.05). The SBS of sandblasted samples was significantly higher compared with other surface treatments in all adhesive subgroups (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Bracket bonding to aged composite using Vertise Flow™ with or without surface treatment can serve as an alternative to the conventional orthodontic adhesives. © 2020 CEO