Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Models to Predict Length of Stay in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Literature Review and Appraisal Publisher



Farimani RM1 ; Karim H2 ; Atashi A3 ; Tohidinezhad F4 ; Bahaadini K1 ; Abuhanna A5, 6 ; Eslami S4, 5, 7
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Medical Informatics, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Health Information Management, Faculty of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. E-Health Department, Virtual School, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  4. 4. Department of Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
  5. 5. Medical Informatics, UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef, Amsterdam, Netherlands
  6. 6. Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, Netherlands
  7. 7. Pharmaceutical Research Center, School of Pharmacy, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

Source: BMC Emergency Medicine Published:2024


Abstract

Introduction: Prolonged Length of Stay (LOS) in ED (Emergency Department) has been associated with poor clinical outcomes. Prediction of ED LOS may help optimize resource utilization, clinical management, and benchmarking. This study aims to systematically review models for predicting ED LOS and to assess the reporting and methodological quality about these models. Methods: The online database PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (10 Sep 2023) was searched for English language articles that reported prediction models of LOS in ED. Identified titles and abstracts were independently screened by two reviewers. All original papers describing either development (with or without internal validation) or external validation of a prediction model for LOS in ED were included. Results: Of 12,193 uniquely identified articles, 34 studies were included (29 describe the development of new models and five describe the validation of existing models). Different statistical and machine learning methods were applied to the papers. On the 39-point reporting score and 11-point methodological quality score, the highest reporting scores for development and validation studies were 39 and 8, respectively. Conclusion: Various studies on prediction models for ED LOS were published but they are fairly heterogeneous and suffer from methodological and reporting issues. Model development studies were associated with a poor to a fair level of methodological quality in terms of the predictor selection approach, the sample size, reproducibility of the results, missing imputation technique, and avoiding dichotomizing continuous variables. Moreover, it is recommended that future investigators use the confirmed checklist to improve the quality of reporting. © The Author(s) 2024.