Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Comparative Study of Energy Consumption, Kinetic, and Performance Between Conventional and Baffled Photocatalytic Reactor (Bpcr) to Ofloxacin Photo-Degradation Publisher Pubmed



Karimi P1, 2 ; Sadani M1, 2 ; Azarpira H3 ; Rasolevandi T4 ; Sarafraz M1
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Student Research Committee, School of Public Health and Safety, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Environmental Health Engineering Department, School of Public Health and Safety, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Environmental Health Engineering Department, Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Saveh University of Medical Sciences, Saveh, Iran
  4. 4. Environmental Health Engineering Department, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Source: Environmental Science and Pollution Research Published:2022


Abstract

Regarding the cost-effective photo-degradation of ofloxacin (OFL), present study investigates UV/sulfite /ZnO (USZ) in reactor conventional (without baffles) and baffled photocatalytic reactor (BPCR). The optimal condition was 0.77:2:50 sulfite/ZnO/OFL molar ratio, pH 7, and 30 min reaction time for 100% degradation of 200 mg L−1 concentration of OFL. As information obtained, the UZI process reduces the BOD and COD level about 66% to 86.29% within 80 min reaction, respectively. Also, BOD/COD ratio initial from 0.26 reaches 0.6 after 30 min of reaction time. Kinetic investigation increasing OFL concentration, kobs and robs increase, and, secondly, in the conventional and BPCR reactor, kobs increase is about 17% and 50% with increasing OFL concentration from 50 to 200 mgL−1. Also, figure-of-merit EEo varies from 12.66 to 17.41 and 7.26 to 10.15 kWhm3 for conventional reactor and 8.66–13.61 to 5.24–8.12 kWhm3, respectively. Also, kinetic model EEo declines from 15.23 to 8.61 and from 13.31 to 5.37 kWh m−3 in conventional and BPCR, respectively. Total cost of the system (TCS) decreases from 7.31 to 2.16 $ in conventional reactor and 4.57 to 0.55 $ in PCBR reactor. Total cost of the system (TCS) was investigated at different concentrations. © 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.