Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Comparison of Laboratory-Based and Non-Laboratory-Based Who Cardiovascular Disease Risk Charts: A Population-Based Study Publisher Pubmed



Rezaei F1 ; Seif M2 ; Gandomkar A3 ; Fattahi MR4 ; Malekzadeh F5 ; Sepanlou SG5 ; Hasanzadeh J6
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Social Medicine, Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, Jahrom, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Epidemiology, School of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
  3. 3. Non-Communicable Disease Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
  4. 4. Gastroenterohepatology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
  5. 5. Digestive Disease Research Center, Digestive Disease Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  6. 6. Research Centre for Health Sciences, Institute of Health, School of Health, Department of Epidemiology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

Source: Journal of Translational Medicine Published:2022


Abstract

Background: Determining the risk of Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) is a necessity for timely preventive interventions in high-risk groups. However, laboratory testing may be impractical in countries with limited resources. This study aimed at comparison and assessment of the agreement between laboratory-based and non-laboratory-based WHO risk charts models. Methods: This study was performed using the baseline data of 8138 participants in the pars cohort study who had no history of CVD and stroke. The updated 2019 WHO model was used to determine the 10-year fatal and non-fatal CVD risks. In general, there are two types of new WHO risk prediction models for CVD. The scores were determined based on age, sex, smoking status, diabetes, Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP), and total cholesterol for the laboratory-based model and age, sex, smoking status, SBP, and Body Mass Index (BMI) for the non-laboratory-based model. The agreement of these two models was determined via kappa statistics for the classified risk (low: < 10%, moderate: 10–< 20%, high: ≥ 20%). Correlation coefficients (r) and scatter plots was used for correlation between scores. Results: The results revealed very strong correlation coefficients for all sex and age groups (r = 0.84 for males < 60 years old, 0.93 for males ≥ 60 years old, 0.85 for females < 60 years old, and 0.88 for females ≥ 60 years old). In the laboratory-based model, low, moderate, and high risks were 76.10%, 18.17%, and 5.73%, respectively. These measures were respectively obtained as 77.00%, 18.08%, and 4.92% in the non-laboratory-based model. Based on risk classification, the agreement was substantial for males < 60 years old and for both males and females aged ≥ 60 years (kappa values: 0.79 for males < 60 years old, 0.65 for males ≥ 60 years old, and 0.66 for females ≥ 60 years old) and moderate for females < 60 years old (kappa = 0.46). Conclusions: The non-laboratory-based risk prediction model, which is simple, inexpensive, and non-invasive, classifies individuals almost identically to the laboratory-based model. Therefore, in countries with limited resources, these two models can be used interchangeably. © 2022, The Author(s).
Experts (# of related papers)