Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share By
The Household Economic Burden of Non-Communicable Diseases in 18 Countries Publisher



Murphy A1 ; Palafox B1 ; Walliattaei M2 ; Powelljackson T1 ; Rangarajan S2 ; Alhabib KF3 ; Avezum AJ4 ; Calik KBT5 ; Chifamba J6 ; Choudhury T7 ; Dagenais G8 ; Dans AL9 ; Gupta R10 ; Iqbal R11 Show All Authors
Authors
  1. Murphy A1
  2. Palafox B1
  3. Walliattaei M2
  4. Powelljackson T1
  5. Rangarajan S2
  6. Alhabib KF3
  7. Avezum AJ4
  8. Calik KBT5
  9. Chifamba J6
  10. Choudhury T7
  11. Dagenais G8
  12. Dans AL9
  13. Gupta R10
  14. Iqbal R11
  15. Kaur M12
  16. Kelishadi R13
  17. Khatib R14
  18. Kruger IM15
  19. Kutty VR16
  20. Lear SA17
  21. Li W18
  22. Lopezjaramillo P19
  23. Mohan V20
  24. Mony PK21
  25. Orlandini A22
  26. Rosengren A23
  27. Rosnah I24
  28. Seron P25
  29. Teo K2
  30. Tse LA26
  31. Tsolekile L27
  32. Wang Y28
  33. Wielgosz A29
  34. Yan R28
  35. Yeates KE30
  36. Yusoff K31
  37. Zatonska K32
  38. Hanson K1
  39. Yusuf S2
  40. Mckee M1

Source: BMJ Global Health Published:2020


Abstract

Background Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) are the leading cause of death globally. In 2014, the United Nations committed to reducing premature mortality from NCDs, including by reducing the burden of healthcare costs. Since 2014, the Prospective Urban and Rural Epidemiology (PURE) Study has been collecting health expenditure data from households with NCDs in 18 countries. Methods Using data from the PURE Study, we estimated risk of catastrophic health spending and impoverishment among households with at least one person with NCDs (cardiovascular disease, diabetes, kidney disease, cancer and respiratory diseases; n=17 435), with hypertension only (a leading risk factor for NCDs; n=11 831) or with neither (n=22 654) by country income group: high-income countries (Canada and Sweden), upper middle income countries (UMICs: Brazil, Chile, Malaysia, Poland, South Africa and Turkey), lower middle income countries (LMICs: the Philippines, Colombia, India, Iran and the Occupied Palestinian Territory) and low-income countries (LICs: Bangladesh, Pakistan, Zimbabwe and Tanzania) and China. Results The prevalence of catastrophic spending and impoverishment is highest among households with NCDs in LMICs and China. After adjusting for covariates that might drive health expenditure, the absolute risk of catastrophic spending is higher in households with NCDs compared with no NCDs in LMICs (risk difference=1.71%; 95% CI 0.75 to 2.67), UMICs (0.82%; 95% CI 0.37 to 1.27) and China (7.52%; 95% CI 5.88 to 9.16). A similar pattern is observed in UMICs and China for impoverishment. A high proportion of those with NCDs in LICs, especially women (38.7% compared with 12.6% in men), reported not taking medication due to costs. Conclusions Our findings show that financial protection from healthcare costs for people with NCDs is inadequate, particularly in LMICs and China. While the burden of NCD care may appear greatest in LMICs and China, the burden in LICs may be masked by care foregone due to costs. The high proportion of women reporting foregone care due to cost may in part explain gender inequality in treatment of NCDs. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
Other Related Docs