Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share By
Comparison of Fingolimod, Dimethyl Fumarate and Teriflunomide for Multiple Sclerosis Publisher Pubmed



Kalincik T1, 2 ; Kubala Havrdova E3 ; Horakova D3 ; Izquierdo G4 ; Prat A5, 6 ; Girard M5, 6 ; Duquette P5, 6 ; Grammond P7 ; Onofrj M8 ; Lugaresi A9, 10 ; Ozakbas S11 ; Kappos L12 ; Kuhle J12 ; Terzi M13 Show All Authors
Authors
  1. Kalincik T1, 2
  2. Kubala Havrdova E3
  3. Horakova D3
  4. Izquierdo G4
  5. Prat A5, 6
  6. Girard M5, 6
  7. Duquette P5, 6
  8. Grammond P7
  9. Onofrj M8
  10. Lugaresi A9, 10
  11. Ozakbas S11
  12. Kappos L12
  13. Kuhle J12
  14. Terzi M13
  15. Lechnerscott J14, 15
  16. Boz C16
  17. Grandmaison F17
  18. Prevost J18
  19. Sola P19
  20. Ferraro D19
  21. Granella F20, 21
  22. Trojano M22
  23. Bergamaschi R23
  24. Pucci E24
  25. Turkoglu R25
  26. Mccombe PA26
  27. Pesch VV27
  28. Van Wijmeersch B28
  29. Solaro C29
  30. Ramotello C30
  31. Slee M31
  32. Alroughani R32
  33. Yamout B33
  34. Shaygannejad V34
  35. Spitaleri D35
  36. Sanchezmenoyo JL36
  37. Ampapa R37
  38. Hodgkinson S38
  39. Karabudak R39
  40. Butler E40
  41. Vucic S41
  42. Jokubaitis V42
  43. Spelman T42
  44. Butzkueven H42, 43, 44

Source: Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry Published:2019


Abstract

Objective Oral immunotherapies have become a standard treatment in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Direct comparison of their effect on relapse and disability is needed. Methods We identified all patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis treated with teriflunomide, dimethyl fumarate or fingolimod, with minimum 3-month treatment persistence and disability follow-up in the global MSBase cohort study. Patients were matched using propensity scores. Three pairwise analyses compared annualised relapse rates and hazards of disability accumulation, disability improvement and treatment discontinuation (analysed with negative binomial models and weighted conditional survival models, with pairwise censoring). Results The eligible cohorts consisted of 614 (teriflunomide), 782 (dimethyl fumarate) or 2332 (fingolimod) patients, followed over the median of 2.5 years. Annualised relapse rates were lower on fingolimod compared with teriflunomide (0.18 vs 0.24; p=0.05) and dimethyl fumarate (0.20 vs 0.26; p=0.01) and similar on dimethyl fumarate and teriflunomide (0.19 vs 0.22; p=0.55). No differences in disability accumulation (p≥0.59) or improvement (p≥0.14) were found between the therapies. In patients with ≥3-month treatment persistence, subsequent discontinuations were less likely on fingolimod than teriflunomide and dimethyl fumarate (p<0.001). Discontinuation rates on teriflunomide and dimethyl fumarate were similar (p=0.68). Conclusion The effect of fingolimod on relapse frequency was superior to teriflunomide and dimethyl fumarate. The effect of the three oral therapies on disability outcomes was similar during the initial 2.5 years on treatment. Persistence on fingolimod was superior to the two comparator drugs. © 2019 Author(s) (or their employer(s)). No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other Related Docs
20. Promising Effect of Rapamycin on Multiple Sclerosis, Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders (2018)