Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
The Comparison of Retinal Blood Flow After Scleral Buckling Surgery With or Without Encircling Procedure



Dehghani A1 ; Razmjoo H1 ; Fazel F1 ; Karami M2 ; Etesampour A1 ; Ghanbari H1 ; Kianersi F1 ; Akhlaghi M1 ; Fesharaki H1
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Isfahan Eye Research Center, Alzahra Hospital, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  2. 2. Department Radiology, Alzahra Hospital, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Source: Journal of Research in Medical Sciences Published:2013

Abstract

Aim: We aimed to compare peak systolic velocity of central retinal artery (PSV.CRA) and peak systolic velocity of ophthalmic artery (PSV.OA) between patients with retinal detachment who were treated with segmental scleral bucking and scleral buckling with encircling procedure. Materials and Methods: This study was a descriptive-analytic cross sectional study that was performed in Isfahan university referral centers since April 2010 to April 2011. Of the patients who have undergone scleral buckling surgery, 20patients belonging to two groups were randomly selected to enroll in the study. Study groups were, patients who have undergone segmental scleral buckling and the other group were patients who have undergone scleral buckling with encircling procedure. Patients were invited to perform color Doppler imaging. PSV-RA and PSV-OA were measured and documented in both operated and unoperated eyes. All of the Doppler's performed at least three months after ophthalmic surgery. Results: We found significant decrease in PSV.CRA among patients in both groups. In patients who had undergone scleral buckling with encircling procedure PSV.CRA was 11.03 ± 3.04(cm/sec) and 14.83 ± 4.80 in operated and unoperated eye respectively (P = 0.03). In other hand, who treated with segmental scleral buckling these parameters were 11.02 ± 2.48 and 14.45 ± 4.69(P = 0.03). PSV.OA did not change significantly in each method. The difference between mean PSV.CRA and PSV.OA in operated eye between two study groups was not significant. Conclusion: PSV.CRA reduced significantly in both surgery methods and PSV.OA changes was not significant. However, the mean PSV.CRA and PSV.OA changes did not show statistically significant difference between surgery methods.
Other Related Docs
19. Effects of Propranolol in Patients With Central Serous Chorioretinopathy, Journal of Research in Medical Sciences (2008)