Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Cost-Utility Analysis of Multiple Sclerosis Rehabilitation in Iran Publisher Pubmed



Daroudi R1, 2 ; Mousavi M3 ; Shirazikhah M4 ; Alizadeh Zarei M5 ; Hendi H6 ; Joghataei F6 ; Darvishi A7
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. National Center for Health Insurance Research, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Health Management and Economics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Social Welfare Management Research Center, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  4. 4. Social Determinants of Health Research Center, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  5. 5. Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  6. 6. Department of social welfare management, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  7. 7. Chronic Diseases Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Population Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Source: Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research Published:2023


Abstract

Background: Rehabilitation of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is associated with various clinical, social and economic outcomes. We aimed to evaluate the cost-utility of MS multidisciplinary rehabilitation in Iran. Research design and methods: An economic evaluation was conducted using a Markov model designed to reflect the natural course of the disease and interventions. Parameters and variables were extracted from available evidence, and costs and outcomes were calculated from the social perspective. The base-case analysis considered a 5-year time horizon. Costs were estimated based on approved national standards for MS rehabilitation. Sensitivity analyses were also performed. Results: The average cost of the rehabilitation strategy was higher compared to the non-rehabilitation strategy, but it resulted in higher quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) values. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was found to be $2,845.8 per QALY, indicating that the rehabilitation strategy is cost-effective. In the deterministic sensitivity analysis, extending the time horizon to 10 years made the rehabilitation strategy a dominant choice. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis results were consistent with the base-case findings. Conclusions: The MS multidisciplinary rehabilitation proved to be a cost-effective strategy; however, the results were sensitive to the input values of the model. Increasing the time horizon increased the probability of rehabilitation being cost-effective. © 2023 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
Other Related Docs
15. Multiple Sclerosis and Human Leukocyte Antigen Genotypes: Focus on the Middle East and North Africa Region, Multiple Sclerosis Journal - Experimental# Translational and Clinical (2020)
16. Activation of Complement: A Potent Biomarker in Multiple Sclerosis, Translational Neuroimmunology: Multiple Sclerosis: Volume 8 (2023)
18. Prevalence and Incidence of Multiple Sclerosis in Ardabil, Northwest of Iran, Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders (2021)
27. The Prevalence of Multiple Sclerosis in Tehran, Iran, in 2020, Current Journal of Neurology (2023)
29. Quality of Life and Cognitive Emotion Regulation Strategies in Multiple Sclerosis Patients, Journal of Rational - Emotive and Cognitive - Behavior Therapy (2023)