Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Bone Healing Around Titanium Implants in a Preclinical Model of Bile Duct Ligation-Induced Liver Injury Publisher Pubmed



Talebian R1, 2 ; Kampleitner C3, 4, 5 ; Sagl B6 ; Kuchler U7 ; Dehpour AR2, 8 ; Gruber R1, 5, 9
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Oral Biology, University Clinic of Dentistry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
  2. 2. Experimental Medicine Research Center, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Karl Donath Laboratory for Hard Tissue and Biomaterial Research, University Clinic of Dentistry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
  4. 4. Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology, AUVA Research Center, Vienna, Austria
  5. 5. Austrian Cluster for Tissue Regeneration, Vienna, Austria
  6. 6. Department of Prosthodontics, University Clinic of Dentistry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
  7. 7. Department of Oral Surgery, University Clinic of Dentistry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
  8. 8. Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  9. 9. Department of Periodontology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

Source: Clinical Oral Implants Research Published:2021


Abstract

Objectives: Chronic liver disease increases the risk for periodontal disease and osteoporotic fractures, but its impacts on bone regeneration remain unknown. Herein, we studied the impact of liver cirrhosis on peri-implant bone formation. Material and Methods: A total of 20 male Wistar rats were randomly divided into two groups: one with the common bile duct ligated (BDL) and the respective sham-treated control group (SHAM). After four weeks of disease induction, titanium mini-screws were inserted into the tibia. Successful induction of liver cirrhosis was confirmed by the presence of clinical symptoms. Another four weeks later, peri-implant bone volume per tissue volume (BV/TV) and bone-to-implant contact (BIC) were determined by histomorphometric analysis. Results: Peri-implant bone formation was not significantly different between the SHAM and BDL groups. In the cortical compartment, the median percentage of peri-implant new bone was 10.1% (95% CI of mean 4.0–35.7) and 22.5% (13.8–30.6) in the SHAM and BDL groups, respectively (p =.26). Consistently, the new bone in direct contact with the implant was 18.1% (0.4–37.8) and 23.3% (9.2–32.8) in SHAM and BDL groups, respectively (p =.38). When measuring the medullary compartment, the new bone area was 7.1% (4.8–10.4) and 10.4% (7.2–13.5) in the SHAM and BDL groups, respectively (p =.17). Medullary new bone in direct contact with the implant was 10.0% (1.2–50.4) and 20.6% (16.8–35.3) in SHAM and BDL groups, respectively, and thus comparable between the two groups (p =.46). Conclusions: Bile duct ligation has no significant impact on the early stages of peri-implant bone formation. © 2021 The Authors. Clinical Oral Implants Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.