Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share By
Biofluid Biomarkers in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Scoping Review Publisher Pubmed



Edalatfar M1 ; Piri SM1 ; Mehrabinejad MM1, 2 ; Mousavi MS3 ; Meknatkhah S3 ; Fattahi MR1, 4 ; Kavyani Z5 ; Hajighadery A1 ; Kaveh M1 ; Aryannejad A1 ; Ghafouri M1 ; Jamshidi E6 ; Rezwanifar MM1 ; Sadeghinaini M7 Show All Authors
Authors
  1. Edalatfar M1
  2. Piri SM1
  3. Mehrabinejad MM1, 2
  4. Mousavi MS3
  5. Meknatkhah S3
  6. Fattahi MR1, 4
  7. Kavyani Z5
  8. Hajighadery A1
  9. Kaveh M1
  10. Aryannejad A1
  11. Ghafouri M1
  12. Jamshidi E6
  13. Rezwanifar MM1
  14. Sadeghinaini M7
  15. Bari A8
  16. Sharifalhoseini M1

Source: Neurocritical Care Published:2021


Abstract

Emerging evidence suggests that biofluid-based biomarkers have diagnostic and prognostic potential in traumatic brain injuries (TBI). However, owing to the lack of a conceptual framework or comprehensive review, it is difficult to visualize the breadth of materials that might be available. We conducted a systematic scoping review to map and categorize the evidence regarding biofluid-based biochemical markers of TBI. A comprehensive search was undertaken in January 2019. Of 25,354 records identified through the literature search, 1036 original human studies were included. Five hundred forty biofluid biomarkers were extracted from included studies and classified into 19 distinct categories. Three categories of biomarkers including cytokines, coagulation tests, and nerve tissue proteins were investigated more than others and assessed in almost half of the studies (560, 515, and 502 from 1036 studies, respectively). S100 beta as the most common biomarker for TBI was tested in 21.2% of studies (220 articles). Cortisol was the only biomarker measured in blood, cerebrospinal fluid, urine, and saliva. The most common sampling time was at admission and within 24 h of injury. The included studies focused mainly on biomarkers from blood and central nervous system sources, the adult population, and severe and blunt injuries. The most common outcome measures used in studies were changes in biomarker concentration level, Glasgow coma scale, Glasgow outcome scale, brain computed tomography scan, and mortality rate. Biofluid biomarkers could be clinically helpful in the diagnosis and prognosis of TBI. However, there was no single definitive biomarker with accurate characteristics. The present categorization would be a road map to investigate the biomarkers of the brain injury cascade separately and detect the most representative biomarker of each category. Also, this comprehensive categorization could provide a guiding framework to design combined panels of multiple biomarkers. © 2021, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and Neurocritical Care Society.
Other Related Docs
13. Impact of Curcumin on Traumatic Brain Injury and Involved Molecular Signaling Pathways, Recent Patents on Food# Nutrition and Agriculture (2020)
16. Introduction on Neuroinflammation, Translational Neuroimmunology: Neuroinflammation: Volume 7 (2023)
18. Nmda Receptors Antagonists Alleviated the Acute Phase of Traumatic Brain Injury, Iranian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences (2025)