Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Dietary Acid Load in Relation to Depression and Anxiety in Adults Publisher Pubmed



Milajerdi A1, 2 ; Hassanzadeh Keshteli A3, 4 ; Haghighatdoost F5 ; Azadbakht L1, 5, 6 ; Esmaillzadeh A1, 5, 6 ; Adibi P4
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Community Nutrition, School of Nutritional Sciences and Dietetics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Students' Scientific Research Center (SSRC), Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
  4. 4. Integrative Functional Gastroenterology Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  5. 5. Food Security Research Center and Department of Community Nutrition, School of Nutrition and Food Science, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  6. 6. Diabetes Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Source: Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics Published:2020


Abstract

Background: No previous study has examined the association of dietary acid load (DAL) with depression and anxiety in adults. The present study aimed to investigate the association between DAL and the risk of depression and anxiety in Iranian adults. Methods: In total, 4378 non-academic healthy personnel (1909 men and 2469 women) were included in this cross-sectional study. A validated detailed food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) was used to assess dietary intakes of participants. DAL was estimated using the protein to potassium ratio (Pro:K). Depression and anxiety were screened using an Iranian validated Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale questionnaire. Results: Participants with the highest DAL had a higher risk of depression compared to those in the lowest category [odds ratio (OR) = 1.57; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.27–1.95, Ptrend < 0.001), which remained unchanged after controlling for probable confounders, such that those in the top category of DAL had a 100% higher risk of having depression than those in the bottom category (OR = 2.00; 95% CI = 1.52–2.64). In addition, a significant positive association was seen between DAL and anxiety in a crude model (OR = 1.35; 95% CI = 1.02–1.78, Ptrend = 0.01) and even after adjustment for a wide range of confounders, such that participants in the top category of DAL had a 92% greater risk of anxiety than those in the bottom category (OR = 1.92; 95% CI = 1.35–2.74, Ptrend < 0.001). Conclusions: In the present study, we found a significant direct association between DAL and the risk of depression, as well as anxiety. Further studies, in particular prospective cohorts are required to confirm these findings. © 2019 The British Dietetic Association Ltd.
Other Related Docs
15. Psychological Disorders and Dietary Patterns by Reduced-Rank Regression, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (2019)
41. Study of Associations Between the Diet Diversity and Degree of Anxiety in Iranian Adolescent Girls, 2017, Iranian Journal of Nutrition Sciences and Food Technology (2020)
46. Glycemic Index, Glycemic Load, and Common Psychological Disorders, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (2016)