Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Other Immunotherapies in the Treatment of Spinal Column Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Efficacy, and Safety Publisher



B Kaye BRANDON ; Lg Kehoe Laura G ; N Dholaria NIKHIL ; Mm Sabahi Mohammadmahdi M ; A Soltani Khaboushan ALIREZA ; D T Soto Rubio DIEGO ; Fr Yusuf Fayyadh R ; H Choi HOON ; Cm Carballocuello Cesar M ; P Alikhani PUYA
Source: European Spine Journal Published:2025

Abstract

Purpose: Spinal metastases affect up to 70% of systemic cancer patients, with overall survival averaging less than six months. Traditional chemotherapeutic agents have unsatisfactory results, leading to immunotherapy (IT) investigations. There is no clear consensus on the benefits and risks of IT for spinal tumors. This study assesses the current literature to determine IT safety and survival efficacy for tumors involving spinal column. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search was conducted across Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed through September 15th, 2024. Patient demographics, disease control, survival, and toxicity were analyzed using R. A meta-analysis was conducted using a random-intercept logistic regression model to evaluate the effectiveness of adjunctive IT for spine tumors. The quality of included studies assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS). Results: A total of 416 articles were screened, with 17 included for qualitative analysis. The studies included 727 patients, with excluding cases of unknown primary origin, the most common primary tumor types were lung cancer, followed by renal cell carcinoma, and melanoma. The most common IT treatments in studies that reported specific types were anti-PD-L1, followed by anti-PD-1 treatments. Meta-analysis showed tumor control rates of 80% (95% CI: 71–87%) following adjunctive IT and the pooled toxicity rate was 5% (95% CI: 1–26%), both with low heterogeneity (I² = 0%). With a maximum follow-up period of 97 months on patients with available data, there were 65 recorded deaths (65.7%) which were all in patients with metastatic spine tumors and no death were recorded in primary spine tumors and the log-rank test indicated a significantly higher overall survival (OS) rate for adjunctive IT in patients with primary spine tumors compared to those with metastatic spine tumors (P< 0.0001). The OS rates were 75%, 57%, 38%, 26%, and 16% at 6-, 12-, 24-, 36-, and 60 months post-IT, respectively. Conclusion: When used as an adjuvant treatment, IT is associated with a high rate of tumor control and a low rate of toxicity in patients with spinal metastases. Additionally, there is a significant improvement in OS for patients with primary spine tumors compared to those with metastatic spine tumors as an adjuvant treatment. Future studies are warranted to further elucidate the benefits and risks of IT in this patient population as a primary treatment modality. © 2025 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.