Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Predictors of Community Preparedness for Flood in Dire-Dawa Town, Eastern Ethiopia: Applying Adapted Version of Health Belief Model Publisher



Ejeta LT1, 2 ; Ardalan A3, 4, 5 ; Paton D6 ; Yaseri M7
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Disaster and Emergency Health, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences-International Campus, No. 6-Hajatdost Alley-South Felestin Street, After Keshavarz Blvd., P.O. BOX: 1416683511, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Private Consultant, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
  3. 3. Department of Disaster Public Health, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Science, No. 78, Italia Ave. 1417755331, Tehran, Iran
  4. 4. Department of Disaster and Emergency Health, National Institute of Health Research, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
  5. 5. Harvard Humanitarian Initiative, Harvard University, Cambridge, United States
  6. 6. School of Psychological and Clinical Sciences, Charles Darwin University, Ellengowan Drive, Casuarina, Darwin, 0909, Northern Territory, Australia
  7. 7. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Source: International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction Published:2016


Abstract

A cross-sectional study was conducted in June and July 2015, aiming at investigating the cross cultural utility of adapted version of Health Belief Model (HBM) in predicting disaster preparedness for flood hazards at household levels in Dire Dawa town, Ethiopia. To accommodate the fact that this work was undertaken in a collectivistic culture in which social processes play more prominent roles in interpretation and action selection, a structured questionnaire was developed by adding community participation to the prominent constructs of HBM and modifying self-efficacy to collective-efficacy. Households (660) were selected by stratified systematic random sampling technique. From each household, an individual aged 18 or above was selected by random and participated in the study. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) and Generalized Structural Equation Modeling (GSEM) analyses were done using STATA version-13.0. SEM analysis showed that the total effects of perceived threat (path coefficient (β)=−0.002, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): [−0.003, −0.001]), perceived benefits minus perceived barriers (β=−0.048, 95% CI: [−0.080, −0.015]), and cues to actions (β=−0.18, 95% CI: [−0.25, −0.11]) on preparedness were significant. The total effects of collective efficacy (β=0.011, 95% CI: [−0.027, 0.049]), perceived susceptibility (β=−0.0007, 95% CI: [−0.003, 0.002]), perceived severity (β=−0.002, 95% CI: [−0.007, 0.004]), and community participation (β=−0.0001, 95% CI: [−0.0003, 0.0001]) on preparedness were non-significant. In GSEM factor analysis, ethnicity, religion and residential duration were significantly associated with preparedness. Intervention is needed on barriers and perceived threat to enhance collective efficacy and preparedness. © 2016 Elsevier Ltd