Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Formulation of Recombinant H1n1 Hemagglutinin in Mf59 and Alum Adjuvants: A Comparison of the Vaccines Potency and Efficacy in Balb/C Mice Publisher Pubmed



Sepasi A1 ; Ghafourian M1, 2 ; Taghizadeh M3 ; Mahdavi M4, 5, 6
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Immunology, School of Medicine, Medical Basic Sciences Research Institute, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
  2. 2. Cellular and Molecular Research Center, Medical Basic Sciences Research Institute, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
  3. 3. Department of Medical Vaccine, Razi Vaccine and Serum Research Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran
  4. 4. Advanced Therapy Medicinal Product (ATMP) Department, Breast Cancer Research Center, Motamed Cancer Institute, Academic Center for Education, Culture and Research (ACECR), Tehran, Iran
  5. 5. Recombinant Vaccine Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  6. 6. Immunotherapy Group, Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences (TIPS), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Source: Viral Immunology Published:2023


Abstract

In this study, we reported the expression and potency of the recombinant H1N1 hemagglutinin (HA) vaccine as our in-house vaccine in a BALB/c mouse model. Recombinant H1N1 HA was produced in SF9 cell line, purified and formulated in MF59 adjuvant. Experimental mice were injected on days 0 and 14 with MF59-formulated vaccine, alum-based vaccine, and phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Interleukin (IL)-2, IL-4, and interferon (IFN)-c were assessed with commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Antibody responses and cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) activity were assessed by hemagglutination inhibition and granzyme B ELISA, respectively. Moreover, the mice were challenged to show the vaccine efficacy. A considerable rise in IFN-c and IL-4, as well as IFN-c/IL-4 ratio, was observed in comparison with the alum-based vaccine and PBS group. Furthermore, our candidate vaccine showed superiority in humoral immune responses and CTL activity versus the alum-based vaccine and PBS group. The challenge showed that the survival rate in the vaccinated groups revealed a significant increase as compared with that in the PBS group. In conclusion, our candidate vaccine showed a robust Th1 response and CTL activity the alum-based vaccine. Moreover, a significant humoral immune response and a higher survival rate were detected in our vaccine as compared with the alum-based vaccine. It seems that the superiority of the MF59-based vaccine is due to the type of vaccine formulation in the candidate vaccine. © Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.