Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
The Usefulness of Serum Leucine-Rich Alpha-2 Glycoprotein As a Novel Biomarker in Monitoring Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Publisher



Shirmard FO1 ; Pourfaraji SM1 ; Saeedian B1, 2 ; Bagheri T1 ; Ismaiel A3 ; Matsumoto S4 ; Babajani N1, 2
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. School of Medicine, United States
  2. 2. Digestive Diseases Research Institute (DDRI), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Iuliu Hatieganu’ University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
  4. 4. Department of Gastroenterology, Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan

Source: European Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Published:2025


Abstract

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a condition of unknown origin. It does not have a definite cure and its response to various treatments can be evaluated based on symptom-based measures, invasive procedures, or biomarker levels, highlighting the need for an accurate biomarker. Since C-reactive protein (CRP) and fecal calprotectin have their shortcomings, the need for a novel biomarker remains critical. Systematic searches of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase were performed In January 2024. PROSPERO number is CRD42024507383. We assessed the accuracy of leucine-rich alpha-2 glycoprotein (LRG) in identifying disease activity among patients with IBD using a bivariate diagnostic random-effects model. Fourteen studies involving 1794 individuals conducted in Japan were selected for our systematic review. The sensitivity and specificity of LRG levels for detecting disease activity were analyzed in patients with IBD and in two subgroups (ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease). The synthesized sensitivity and specificity were 75.4% [95% confidence interval (CI), 68.9–80.9%] and 77.3% (95% CI, 69.9–83.2%), respectively, in patients with IBD, 73.1% (95% CI, 62.7–81.5%) and 81.9% (95% CI, 73.9–87.8%), respectively, in patients with CD, and the secondary analysis of the ulcerative colitis subgroup showed a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 72.8 and 59.7%, respectively. Our systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated that LRG could be useful in detecting IBD activity. It is superior for detecting disease activity, especially in patients with normal CRP levels. The LRG was more accurate in monitoring disease activity in patients with CD than in patients with IBD. Copyright © 2025 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Other Related Docs