Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Accuracy of Maxillary Full-Arch Digital Impressions of Tooth and Implant Models Made by Two Intraoral Scanners Publisher Pubmed



Siadat H1 ; Chitsaz F2 ; Zeighami S1 ; Esmaeilzadeh A3
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Dental Research Center, Dentistry Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. School of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
  3. 3. Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran

Source: Clinical and Experimental Dental Research Published:2024


Abstract

Objectives: Limited studies are available on the accuracy of intraoral scanners (IOSs) for full-arch implant and tooth models. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of maxillary full-arch digital impressions of tooth and implant models made by two IOSs. Materials and Methods: This in vitro, experimental study was conducted on two maxillary dentiform models: one with six prepared natural teeth and the other with six implants at the site of canine, first premolar, and first molar teeth, bilaterally. A highly accurate industrial scanner was used for actual measurements on the models that served as the reference scan. TS (Trios3) and CO (CEREC Omnicam) IOSs were then used to scan each model 10 times according to the manufacturer's instructions. All scans were saved in STL format. The GOM Inspect software was used according to the best-fit algorithm to compare the accuracy of measurements in the groups with the reference scan. The trueness and precision were calculated. Statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS by one-way analysis of variance and t-test (α =.05). Results: TS showed a significantly higher trueness than CO for both tooth and implant models (p <.05). TS also revealed significantly higher precision than CO for the tooth model; however, the difference in precision for the implant model was not significant between the two IOSs (p >.05). Conclusions: TS showed higher accuracy than CO in both tooth and implant models. © 2024 The Authors. Clinical and Experimental Dental Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Experts (# of related papers)