Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
The Impact of Maternal Smoking During Pregnancy on Childhood Asthma: Adjusted for Exposure Misclassification; Results From the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2011–2012 Publisher Pubmed



Moradzadeh R1 ; Mansournia MA2 ; Baghfalaki T3 ; Nadrian H4 ; Gustafson P5 ; Mccandless LC6
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Epidemiology, School of Health, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Department of Statistics, Faculty of Mathematical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
  4. 4. Department of Health Education & Promotion, Faculty of Health Sciences, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
  5. 5. Department of Statistics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
  6. 6. Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada

Source: Annals of Epidemiology Published:2018


Abstract

Purpose: We sought to examine the association between childhood asthma and self-reported maternal smoking during pregnancy (MSDP) after adjusting for a range of exposure misclassification scenarios using a Bayesian approach that incorporated exposure misclassification probability estimates from the literature. Methods: Self-reported MSDP and asthma data were extracted from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2011–2012. The association between self-reported MSDP and asthma was adjusted for exposure misclassification using a Bayesian bias model approach. Results: We included 3074 subjects who were 1–15 years of age, including 492 asthma cases. The mean (SD) of age of the participants was 8.5 (4.1) and 7.1 (4.2) years and the number (percentage) of female was 205 (42%) and 1314 (51%) among asthmatic and nonasthmatic groups, respectively. The odds ratio (OR) for the association between self-reported MSDP and asthma in logistic regression adjusted for confounders was 1.28 (95% confidence interval: 0.92, 1.77). In a Bayesian analysis that adjusted for exposure misclassification using external data, we found different ORs between MSDP and asthma by applying different priors (posterior ORs 0.90 [95% credible interval {CRI}: 0.47, 1.60] to 3.05 [95% CRI: 1.73, 5.53] in differential and 1.22 [CRI 95%: 0.62, 2.25] to 1.60 CRI: 1.18, 2.19) in nondifferential misclassification settings. Conclusions: Given the assumptions and the accuracy of the bias model, the estimated effect of MSDP on asthma after adjusting for misclassification was strengthened in many scenarios. © 2018 Elsevier Inc.
Other Related Docs
10. Bayesian Methods for Clinicians, Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran (2020)
28. Using Causal Diagrams for Biomedical Research, Annals of Emergency Medicine (2023)
30. Causal Diagrams for Immortal Time Bias, International Journal of Epidemiology (2021)
35. Interaction Contrasts and Collider Bias, American Journal of Epidemiology (2022)
44. Authors’ Reply, Climacteric (2018)