Surface Treatment Comparison by Application of Diamond Bur and Er,Cr:Ysgg at Different Powers: Morphological and Mechanical Evaluation

Surface Treatment Comparison by Application of Diamond Bur and Er,Cr:Ysgg at Different Powers: Morphological and Mechanical Evaluation Publisher

Mirzaie M¹ ; Yassini E¹ ; Etemadi A² ; Tavakoli A¹ ; Chiniforush N³

Show Affiliations

1. Restorative Dentistry Department, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2. Periodontics department, Azad University of Medical Sciences, Dental Branch, Tehran, Iran
3. Laser Research Center of Dentistry, Dental Research Institute, Tehran University of Medial Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Source: Laser Therapy Published:2016

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluated the micro-tensile bond strength of new and previous composite resin restorations after surface treatment with diamond bur and Er,Cr:YSGG laser at different power settings (2,3 and 4 W). Materials and methods: Micro-hybride composite resin was inserted in metallic mold 5 ×5 ×15 mm and cured for 40 sec according to manufacturer's instruction.12 blocks were made. The bonded surfaces of the 12 blocks so obtained were subsequently ground using Silicon Carbide papers 1200 grit, for 15 seconds under running water. Then the samples randomly were divided into 4 groups: (G1) Bur-treated, (G2) Er,Cr:YSGG laser with power of 2 W and energy of 100 mJ, (G3) Er,Cr:YSGG laser with power of 3 W and energy of 150 mJ, (G4) Er,Cr:YSGG laser with power of 4 W and energy of 200 mJ. One sample of each group was analyzed by SEM while, after cutting the blocks to 1 mm2 of area samples, the others samples were mechanically tested by Universal testing machine with the speed of 0.5 mm per minute till fracture point. Data were analysed using One-Way ANOVA and Tukey Test. Results: T-test showed no significantly differences between G2 and G4(P=0.064) while G3 demonstrated significant differences than G2 (P=0.001) and G4(P=0.000) and also between samples treated with bur (G1) and G2 (P=0.242),G3 (P=0.000),G4 (P=0.829); G1 didn't significantly differ to G2 and G4(P>0.05), while G1 and G3(P<0.05). Conclusion: On surface treatment of repaired composite, samples treated by laser at 3W power showed better condition of micro-tensile bond strength. © 2016 JMLL, Tokyo, Japan.

Related Docs

View other Related Docs

1. Effect of Different Powers of Er, Cr:Ysgg Laser Treatment on Surface Morphology of Microhybride Composite Resin: Scanning Electron Microscope (Sem) Evaluation, Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences (2015)

2. In Vitro Evaluation of Repair Bond Strength of Composite: Effect of Surface Treatments With Bur and Laser and Application of Universal Adhesive, Laser Therapy (2017)

3. Scanning Electron Microscope (Sem) Evaluation of Composite Surface Irradiated by Different Powers of Er:Yag Laser, Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences (2015)

4. Effect of Thermocycling and Surface Treatment on Repair Bond Strength of Composite, Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry (2017)

5. Microtensile Repair Bond Strength of a Composite After Accelerated Artificial Aging: Effect of the Air Abrasion, Bur, Er:Yag Laser, Two-Step Self-Etch Bonding, and Universal Bonding Repair System, Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences (2022)

6. Repair Bond Strength of Composite: Effect of Surface Treatment and Type of Composite, Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry (2018)

7. Comparative Efficacy of Er,Cr:Ysgg and Er:Yag Lasers for Etching of Composite for Orthodontic Bracket Bonding, Lasers in Medical Science (2018)

8. Effects of Three Surface Conditioning Techniques on Repair Bond Strength of Nanohybrid and Nanofilled Composites, Dental Research Journal (2015)

Experts (# of related papers)

View all Related Experts

Sedighe Sadat Hashemi Kamangar (3)

Sima Shahabi (2)

Style	Citing Format
MLA	Mirzaie M, et al.. "Surface Treatment Comparison by Application of Diamond Bur and Er,Cr:Ysgg at Different Powers: Morphological and Mechanical Evaluation." Laser Therapy, vol. 25, no. 3, 2016, pp. 215-220.
APA	Mirzaie M, Yassini E, Etemadi A, Tavakoli A, Chiniforush N (2016). Surface Treatment Comparison by Application of Diamond Bur and Er,Cr:Ysgg at Different Powers: Morphological and Mechanical Evaluation. Laser Therapy, 25(3), 215-220.
Chicago	Mirzaie M, Yassini E, Etemadi A, Tavakoli A, Chiniforush N. "Surface Treatment Comparison by Application of Diamond Bur and Er,Cr:Ysgg at Different Powers: Morphological and Mechanical Evaluation." Laser Therapy 25, no. 3 (2016): 215-220.
Harvard	Mirzaie M et al. (2016) 'Surface Treatment Comparison by Application of Diamond Bur and Er,Cr:Ysgg at Different Powers: Morphological and Mechanical Evaluation', Laser Therapy, 25(3), pp. 215-220.
Vancouver	Mirzaie M, Yassini E, Etemadi A, Tavakoli A, Chiniforush N. Surface Treatment Comparison by Application of Diamond Bur and Er,Cr:Ysgg at Different Powers: Morphological and Mechanical Evaluation. Laser Therapy. 2016;25(3):215-220.
BibTex	@article{ author = {Mirzaie M and Yassini E and Etemadi A and Tavakoli A and Chiniforush N}, title = {Surface Treatment Comparison by Application of Diamond Bur and Er,Cr:Ysgg at Different Powers: Morphological and Mechanical Evaluation}, journal = {Laser Therapy}, volume = {25}, number = {3}, pages = {215-220}, year = {2016} }
RIS	TY - JOUR AU - Mirzaie M AU - Yassini E AU - Etemadi A AU - Tavakoli A AU - Chiniforush N TI - Surface Treatment Comparison by Application of Diamond Bur and Er,Cr:Ysgg at Different Powers: Morphological and Mechanical Evaluation JO - Laser Therapy VL - 25 IS - 3 SP - 215 EP - 220 PY - 2016 ER -

Science Communicator Platform

Authors

Authors Affiliations

Abstract