Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Global, Regional, and National Survey on the Burden and Quality of Care of Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 1990–2017 Publisher Pubmed



Aryannejad A1 ; Tabary M1 ; Ebrahimi N1 ; Mohammadi E1 ; Fattahi N1 ; Roshani S1 ; Masinaei M1 ; Naderimagham S1, 2 ; Azadnajafabad S1 ; Jamshidi K1 ; Fateh SM1, 2 ; Moghimi M1, 2 ; Kompani F3 ; Rezaei N1, 2 Show All Authors
Authors
  1. Aryannejad A1
  2. Tabary M1
  3. Ebrahimi N1
  4. Mohammadi E1
  5. Fattahi N1
  6. Roshani S1
  7. Masinaei M1
  8. Naderimagham S1, 2
  9. Azadnajafabad S1
  10. Jamshidi K1
  11. Fateh SM1, 2
  12. Moghimi M1, 2
  13. Kompani F3
  14. Rezaei N1, 2
  15. Farzadfar F1, 2
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Non-Communicable Diseases Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Population Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Endocrinology and Metabolism Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Division of Hematology and Oncology, Children's Medical Center, Pediatrics Center of Excellence, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Source: Pancreatology Published:2021


Abstract

Background: Pancreatic cancer (PC) is among the most lethal cancers worldwide, and the quality of care provided to PC patients is a vital public health concern. We aimed to investigate the quality of care of PC globally and to report its current burden. Methods: The Quality of Care Index (QCI) was achieved by performing a Principal Component Analysis utilizing the results of the GBD study 2017. The QCI was defined as a range between 0 and 100, in which higher QCIs show higher quality of care. Possible gender- and age-related inequalities in terms of QCI were explored based on WHO world regions and the sociodemographic index (SDI). Results: In 2017, Japan had the highest QCI among all countries (QCI = 99/100), followed by Australia (QCI = 83/100) and the United States (QCI = 76/100). In Japan and Australia, males and females had almost the same QCIs in 2017, while in the United States, females had lower QCIs than males. In contrast to these high-QCI nations, African countries had the lowest QCIs in 2017. Besides, QCI increased by SDI, and high-SDI regions had the highest QCIs. Regarding patients’ age, elderly cases had higher QCIs than younger patients globally and in high-SDI regions. Conclusion: This study provides clinicians and health authorities with a wider vision around the quality of care of PC worldwide and highlights the existing disparities. This could help them investigate possible effective strategies to improve the quality of care in regions with lower QCIs and higher gender- and age-related inequities. © 2021 IAP and EPC
Experts (# of related papers)
Other Related Docs
12. Nanoparticulate Systems for Dental Drug Delivery, Nanoengineered Biomaterials for Advanced Drug Delivery (2020)
24. Cancer Genetics at a Glance: The Comprehensive Insights, Cancer Genetics and Psychotherapy (2017)
28. The Epidemiology of Brain and Spinal Cord Tumors, Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology (2023)
33. Ambient Air Pollution Exposure and Thyroid Cancer Incidence in Iran, Journal of Air Pollution and Health (2021)
36. A Decision Support System for Mammography Reports Interpretation, Health Information Science and Systems (2020)
40. Review on the Most Important Viruses in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinomas, Pakistan Journal of Medical and Health Sciences (2020)
45. Stem Cells and Targeted Gene Therapy in Brain and Spinal Cord Tumors, Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology (2023)