Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Effectiveness of Manual Therapy to the Cervical Spine on Clinical Outcomes and Electrodiagnostic Tests in People With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial Publisher



Zarrin M1, 2 ; Saadat M2, 3 ; Shaterzadeh Yazdi MJ2, 3 ; Ahmadi DS4 ; Jahangiri M5
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Physiotherapy, School of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Physiotherapy, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
  3. 3. Rehabilitation Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
  4. 4. Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Golestan Hospital, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Iran
  5. 5. Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

Source: Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies Published:2024


Abstract

Objective: To determine if cervical spine manual therapy (CMT) plus conventional physical therapy (PT) optimizes clinical objective and self-reported outcomes, compared to PT alone, in people with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Method: Forty-eight patients with the diagnosis of CTS were randomly divided into conventional PT (control group) and conventional PT plus cervical spine manual therapy (intervention group). All patients received 10 sessions of supervised conventional physical therapy (wrist splint, electrotherapy and wrist joint mobilization). Patients in the cervical spine manual therapy group also had manual therapies techniques given to their neck. Visual analog scale (VAS), Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ), the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) questionnaire, median nerve motor distal latency (mMDL), and median sensory nerve conduction velocity (mSNCV) were assessed at three points: baseline, post-intervention, and six months later. Results: The cervical spine manual therapy group showed significantly greater improvement in VAS, DASH score, mMDL, and mSNCV in post-intervention and follow-up compared to the conventional group. There was no significant difference in two subscales of BCTQ at post-intervention for two groups, whereas these two subscales showed a significant difference in favor of the cervical manual therapy group at follow-up. Conclusion: The analysis of results showed that conventional CMT combined with PT could be more effective in improving the clinical outcomes and electrodiagnostic findings of patients with CTS compared to conventional PT only in the long term. Therefore, it can be suggested as a proper therapeutic method in CTS. © 2024