Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Effectiveness of Low-Level Laser Therapy Compared to Ultrasound in Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Publisher



Rayegani SM1 ; Moradijoo M2 ; Raeissadat SA1 ; Bahrami MH1 ; Seyednezhad M3 ; Heidari S4
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. National Center for Health Insurance Research, Iran Health Insurance Organization, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Department of Health Management and Economics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  4. 4. Social Development and Health Promotion Research Center, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran

Source: Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences Published:2019


Abstract

Introduction: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common type of peripheral entrapment neuropathy that occurs in the wrist area in a space called the carpal tunnel. Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) and ultrasound are among the most common methods of physical modalities for treating CTS; the effectiveness of these 2 methods and the superiority of one over the other are not agreed among experts. Methods: In the present systematic review and meta-analysis study, the most important databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, Science Direct, Trip medical database and Google Scholar were searched using appropriate keywords and specific strategies without time limitation to collect data. The collected data was analyzed using the meta-analytic method and the random-effects model. The heterogeneity among studies was examined using I2. The data were analyzed using Review Manager Software. Results: From among 108 related studies, 49 cases were entered for the first stage. After the final examination, 6 studies were selected for meta-analysis. The total number of patients in these 6 studies was 403; 204 subjects were in the LLLT group and 199 subjects were in the ultrasound group. The results of the meta-analyses showed that there was no significant difference between these 2 therapeutic methods in terms of pain relief, symptom severity scale (SSS), functional status scale (FSS), motor latency, sensory latency, hand grip strength, and motor amplitude. Conclusion: Based on the meta-analyses, there was no significant difference between the 2 LLLT and ultrasound methods; in other words, they had similar effectiveness in improving the condition of patients with CTS. However, the authors believe that arriving at conclusions in this area requires high-quality and large size studies. © 2019 Laser Application in Medical Sciences Research Center.
Experts (# of related papers)
Other Related Docs
20. Ways to Enhance Blood Transfusion Safety: A Systematic Review, Florence Nightingale Journal of Nursing (2022)