Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Effect of Belin-Ambrosio Deviation Index on 2-Year Refractive Outcomes of Prk Publisher Pubmed



Shams SS1 ; Hassanzadeh S2 ; Zareighanavati M3 ; Ravanshad Y4 ; Sadeghi J5 ; Ziaei M5 ; Zareighanavati S6
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Student Research Committee, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad Branch, Mashhad, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Optometry, School of Paramedical Sciences and Rehabilitation, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
  3. 3. Eye Research Center, Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  4. 4. Department of Community Medicine, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran
  5. 5. Eye Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
  6. 6. Department of Ophthalmology, New Zealand National Eye Centre, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

Source: Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery Published:2024


Abstract

Purpose:To assess the effect of preoperative Belin-Ambrosio deviation (BAD-D) index on 2-year visual, refractive, and tomographic outcomes, as well as the efficacy and safety of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) surgery.Setting:Eye clinic, Mashhad, Iran.Design:Prospective cohort study.Methods:This study included 66 patients (66 eyes) who underwent PRK surgery, with a minimum follow-up period of 2 years. Participants were divided into 2 groups: preoperative BAD-D ≥1.60 (high BAD-D) and preoperative BAD-D <1.60 (low BAD-D). Preoperative and postoperative visual, refractive, and tomographic parameters were evaluated, and the efficacy and safety of the procedure were compared between groups.Results:66 patients with a mean age of 35.50 ± 8.21 years (range 22 to 55 years) were included. Postoperatively, the mean spherical equivalent (SE) of refractive error was +0.32 ± 0.65 diopters (D) in the high BAD-D group and +0.18 ± 0.66 D in the low BAD-D group (P =.40). In addition, at 2 years of follow-up, the mean uncorrected distance visual acuity was 0.98 ± 0.07 in the high BAD-D group and 0.97 ± 0.08 in the low BAD-D group (P =.905). Among the postoperative tomographic parameters, front elevation thickness, maximum Ambrosio relational thickness, astigmatism, and central corneal thickness were significantly different between the 2 groups (all, P <.05). At the 2-year follow-up, the mean Safety Index was 1.02 ± 0.04, and 1.01 ± 0.04 in high and low BAD-D groups, respectively (P =.37), and the mean Efficacy Index was 0.99 ± 0.07 and 0.98 ± 0.06 in high and low BAD-D groups, respectively (P =.40).Conclusions:The preoperative BAD-D index does not predict postoperative visual, refractive, and tomographic outcomes in patients with low-to-moderate myopia. However, in patients with normal preoperative BAD-D values, higher agreement was expected between the attempted and achieved SE. © 2024 Published by Wolters Kluwer on behalf of ASCRS and ESCRS. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.