Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Evaluation of Corneal Topographic, Tomographic and Biomechanical Indices for Detecting Clinical and Subclinical Keratoconus: A Comprehensive Three-Device Study Publisher



Heidari Z1, 2 ; Hashemi H1 ; Mohammadpour M1, 3 ; Amanzadeh K4 ; Fotouhi A5
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Noor Ophthalmology Research Center, Noor Eye Hospital, Tehran, 1968653111, Iran
  2. 2. School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, 1417613151, Iran
  3. 3. Department of Ophthalmology, Farabi Eye Hospital, Eye Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, 1336616351, Iran
  4. 4. Noor Research Center for Ophthalmic Epidemiology, Noor Eye Hospital, Tehran, 1968653111, Iran
  5. 5. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, 1417613151, Iran

Source: International Journal of Ophthalmology Published:2021


Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the diagnostic ability of topographic and tomographic indices with Pentacam and Sirius as well as biomechanical parameters with Corvis ST for the detection of clinical and subclinical forms of keratoconus (KCN). METHODS: In this prospective diagnostic test study, 70 patients with clinical KCN, 79 patients with abnormal findings in topography and tomography maps with no evidence on clinical examination (subclinical KCN), and 68 normal control subjects were enrolled. The accuracy of topographic, tomographic, and biomechanical parameters was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and cross-validation analysis. The Delong method was used for comparing AUCs. RESULTS: In distinguishing KCN from normal, all parameters showed statistically significant differences between the two groups (P<0.001). Indices with the perfect diagnostic ability (AUC≥0.999) were Sirius KCN vertex of back (KVb), Pentacam random forest index (PRFI), Pentacam index of height decentration (IHD), and Corvis integrated tomographic/biomechanical index (TBI). In distinguishing subclinical KCN from normal, Sirius symmetry index of back (SIb; AUC=0.908), Pentacam inferior-superior difference (IS) value (AUC=0.862), PRFI (AUC=0.847), and Corvis TBI (AUC=0.820) performed best. There were no significant differences between the highest AUCs within keratoconic groups (DeLong, P>0.05). CONCLUSION: In clinical KCN, all topographic, tomographic, and biomechanical indices have acceptable outcomes in terms of sensitivity and specificity. However, in differentiating subclinical forms of KCN from normal corneas, curvature-based parameters (SIb and IS value) followed by integrated indices (PRFI and TBI) are the most powerful tools for early detection of KCN. © 2021 International Journal of Ophthalmology (c/o Editorial Office). All rights reserved.
Other Related Docs
9. Updates on Keratoconus Diagnosis, Keratoconus: Optical and Surgical Management (2024)
10. Pentacam, Diagnostics in Ocular Imaging: Cornea# Retina# Glaucoma and Orbit (2020)
18. Can Oct Pachymetry Identify Keratoconus Suspects?, Iranian Journal of Ophthalmology (2015)
19. Iol’S for Visual Rehabilitation in Stable Keratocounus, Keratoconus: Current and Future State-of-the-Art (2021)
23. Effect of Belin-Ambrosio Deviation Index on 2-Year Refractive Outcomes of Prk, Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (2024)
24. Sirius®, Diagnostics in Ocular Imaging: Cornea# Retina# Glaucoma and Orbit (2020)