Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Feasibility of Monitoring Global Breast Cancer Initiative Framework Key Performance Indicators in 21 Asian National Cancer Centers Alliance Member Countries Publisher



Ong SK1 ; Haruyama R2 ; Yip CH3 ; Ngan TT4, 5 ; Li J6 ; Lai D7 ; Zhang Y8 ; Yi S9, 10 ; Shankar A11 ; Suzanna E12 ; Jung SY13 ; Ho PJ6 ; Yusuf A14 ; Nessa A15 Show All Authors
Authors
  1. Ong SK1
  2. Haruyama R2
  3. Yip CH3
  4. Ngan TT4, 5
  5. Li J6
  6. Lai D7
  7. Zhang Y8
  8. Yi S9, 10
  9. Shankar A11
  10. Suzanna E12
  11. Jung SY13
  12. Ho PJ6
  13. Yusuf A14
  14. Nessa A15
  15. Jung KW16
  16. Fernando E17
  17. Baral S18
  18. Bagherian M19
  19. Pradhan P20
  20. Jugder U21
  21. Vongdala C22
  22. Yusof SN23
  23. Thiri K24
  24. Sripan P25
  25. Cairo C26
  26. Matsuda T27
  27. Sangrajran S28
  28. Kiakmien Tan V29
  29. Mehrotra R30
  30. Anderson BO31
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. PAPRSB Institute of Health Sciences, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Brunei Darussalam
  2. 2. Bureau of International Health Cooperation, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Japan
  3. 3. Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Malaysia
  4. 4. Center for Population Health Sciences, Hanoi University of Public Health, Hanoi, Viet Nam
  5. 5. Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, United Kingdom
  6. 6. Women's Health and Genetics, Genome Institute of Singapore, A∗Star, Singapore
  7. 7. School of Digital Science, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Brunei Darussalam
  8. 8. National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
  9. 9. KHANA Center for Population Health Research, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
  10. 10. Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
  11. 11. Department of Radiation Oncology, Dr BR Ambedkar Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi, India
  12. 12. National Cancer Center Indonesia, Dharmais Cancer Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
  13. 13. Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea
  14. 14. Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centres, Lahore and Peshawar, Pakistan
  15. 15. Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Bangladesh
  16. 16. National Cancer Centre Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, Goyang, South Korea
  17. 17. National Cancer Control Programme, Ministry of Health, Sri Lanka
  18. 18. Bhaktapur Cancer Hospital, Bhaktapur, Nepal
  19. 19. Breast Cancer Research Center, Motamed Cancer Institute, ACECR, Tehran, Iran
  20. 20. Jigme Dorji Wangchuck National Referral Hospital, Bhutan
  21. 21. Cancer Registry-surveillance and Early Detection Division, National Cancer Center of Mongolia, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
  22. 22. Cancer Center, Mittaphab Hospital, Vientiane, Laos
  23. 23. National Cancer Institute, Putrajaya, Malaysia
  24. 24. Pink Rose Breast Cancer Patients Support Group, Yangon, Myanmar
  25. 25. Research Institute for Health Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Thailand
  26. 26. Department of Health, Disease Prevention and Control Bureau, Manila, Philippines
  27. 27. National Cancer Center Institute for Cancer Control, Tokyo, Japan
  28. 28. National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand
  29. 29. National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
  30. 30. Indian Cancer Genome Atlas, India & Centre for Health, Innovation and Policy Foundation, India
  31. 31. World Health Organisation (WHO), Geneva, Switzerland

Source: eClinicalMedicine Published:2024


Abstract

Background: The Global Breast Cancer Initiative (GBCI) Framework, launched by the World Health Organisation (WHO) in 2023, emphasises assessing, strengthening, and scaling up services for the early detection and management of breast cancer. This study aims to determine the feasibility of monitoring the status of breast cancer control in the 21 Asian National Cancer Centers Alliance (ANCCA) countries based on the three GBCI Framework key performance indicators (KPIs): stage at diagnosis, time to diagnosis, and treatment completion. Methods: We reviewed published literature on breast cancer control among 21 ANCCA countries from May to July 2023 to establish data availability and compiled the latest descriptive statistics and sources of the indicators using a standardised data collection form. We performed bivariate Pearson's correlation analysis to measure the strength of correlation between stage at diagnosis, mortality and survival rates, and universal health coverage. Findings: Only 12 (57%) ANCCA member countries published national cancer registry reports on breast cancer age-standardised incidence rate (ASIR) and age-standardised mortality rate (ASMR). Indonesia, Myanmar, and Nepal had provincial data and others relied on WHO's Global Cancer Observatory (GLOBOCAN) estimates. GLOBOCAN data differed from the reported national statistics by 5–10% in Bhutan, Indonesia, Iran, the Republic of Korea, Singapore, and Thailand and >10% in China, India, Malaysia, Mongolia, and Sri Lanka. The proportion of patients diagnosed in stages I and II strongly correlated with the five-year survival rate and with the universal health coverage (UHC) index. Three countries (14%) reported national data with >60% of invasive breast cancer patients diagnosed at stages I and II, and a five-year survival rate of >80%. Over 60% of the ANCCA countries had no published national data on breast cancer staging, the time interval from presentation to diagnosis, and diagnosis to treatment. Five (24%) countries reported data on treatment completion. The definition of delayed diagnosis and treatment completion varied across countries. Interpretation: GBCI's Pillar 1 KPI correlates strongly with five-year survival rate and with the UHC index. Most ANCCA countries lacked national data on cancer staging, timely diagnosis, and treatment completion KPIs. While institutional-level data were available in some countries, they may not represent the nationwide status. Strengthening cancer surveillance is crucial for effective breast cancer control. The GBCI Framework indicators warrant more detailed definitions for standardised data collection. Surrogate indicators which are measurable and manageable in country-specific settings, could be considered for monitoring GBCI indicators. Ensuring UHC and addressing health inequalities are essential to early diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer. Funding: Funding for this research article's processing fee (APC) will be provided by the affiliated institution to support the open-access publication of this work. The funding body is not involved in the study design; collection, management, analysis and interpretation of data; or the decision to submit for publication. The funding body will be informed of any planned publications, and documentation provided. © 2023