Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Gait Stability of Diabetic Patients Is Altered With the Rigid Rocker Shoes Publisher Pubmed



Ghomian B1 ; Naemi R2 ; Mehdizadeh S3 ; Jafari H4, 5 ; Ebrahimi Takamjani I4 ; Aghili R6 ; Machado JM7 ; Silva LFSF7 ; Saeedi H1
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Rehabilitation Research Centre, Department of Orthotics and Prosthetics, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. School of Life Sciences and Education, Staffordshire University, Stoke on Trent, United Kingdom
  3. 3. Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
  4. 4. Rehabilitation Research Centre, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  5. 5. Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychology Psychiatry and Neuroscience, King's College London, United Kingdom
  6. 6. Endocrine Research Center, Institute of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  7. 7. Mechanical Engineering Department, University of Minho, Guimaraes, Portugal

Source: Clinical Biomechanics Published:2019


Abstract

Background: Rigid-rocker shoes may induce gait instability in diabetics, however, is not clearly investigated. The present study investigates if rigid-rocker shoes influence diabetic gait stability. Methods: Fourteen non-neuropathic and nine neuropathic diabetics, plus eleven healthy young-adults were recruited. Full-body kinematic data was captured during walking tasks. Experimental conditions included barefoot and three rocker-shoe designs according to the rocker angle, apex angle and apex position (R10: 10°, 80°, 60%; R15: 15°, 95°, 52%; R20: 20°, 95°, 60%). Sagittal and frontal stability margin, plus fear of fall were main outcome measures. Findings. Sagittal stability margin was not affected by health, however, was increased with R10 and R15 in non-neuropathic diabetics and healthy individuals (R2 = 0.16). Variability of sagittal stability margin was not altered in neuropathic diabetics, but was increased with R15 and R20 in healthy participants, with R15 in non-neuropathic diabetics (R2 = 0.12). Frontal stability margin (R2 = 0.46) and its variability (R2 = 0.39) were significantly increased in neuropathic and non-neuropathic diabetics compared to healthy individuals. Frontal stability margin was significantly higher with R15 in neuropathic diabetics, with R20 in non-neuropathic and healthy participants. Sagittal and frontal stability margin were strongly correlated with fear of fall in neuropathic diabetics. Interpretations. R15 and R20 might challenge gait stability of diabetics cause them restrict centre of mass motion thereby imposing a tighter control over walking. However, neuropathic diabetics generally walk very cautious due to their neuropathy and higher fear of fall. Frontal stability margin, highly affected by health and experimental condition, is a more sensitive indicator of gait stability. © 2019 Elsevier Ltd