Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Dietary Glycemic Index, Glycemic Load, and Chronic Disease: An Umbrella Review of Meta-Analyses of Prospective Cohort Studies Publisher Pubmed



Jayedi A1, 2 ; Soltani S3 ; Jenkins D4, 5, 6, 7 ; Sievenpiper J4, 5, 6, 7 ; Shabbidar S2
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Food Safety Research Center (Salt), Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Community Nutrition, School of Nutritional Science and Dietetics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Yazd Cardiovascular Research Center, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
  4. 4. Faculty of Medicine, Departments of Nutritional Science and Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
  5. 5. Clinical Nutrition & Risk Factor Modification Centre, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada
  6. 6. Division of Endocrinology & Metabolism, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada
  7. 7. Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada

Source: Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition Published:2022


Abstract

We aimed to present a comprehensive review of the association of dietary glycemic index (GI) and load (GL) with the risk of chronic disease. Published meta-analyses of prospective observational studies evaluating the association of dietary GI and GL with risk of chronic disease were identified by a search in PubMed and Scopus to November, 2020. Summary relative risks (SRRs) were recalculated using random-effects models. The certainty of evidence was rated by the GRADE approach. Eighteen meta-analyses of prospective cohort studies, reporting 19 SRRs for dietary GI and 17 SRRs for dietary GL were identified. There was a positive association between dietary GI and the risk of type 2 diabetes, coronary heart disease, and colorectal, breast, and bladder cancers, as well as between dietary GL and the risk of coronary heart disease, type 2 diabetes, and stroke. With regard to cancers at other sites, there was no significant association. The certainty of evidence ranged from very low to low. Although by GRADE classification no associations were rated stronger than low, they were classified as one grade higher when the NutriGrade system was used. Further research is needed to add evidence for the relation of dietary GI and GL with cancer risk. © 2020 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
Other Related Docs