A Histologic, Histomorphometric, and Radiographic Comparison Between Two Complexes of Cenoboen/Cenomembrane and Bio-Oss/Bio-Gide in Lateral Ridge Augmentation: A Clinical Trial Publisher



Amoian B¹ ; Moudi E² ; Majidi MS³ ; Ali Tabatabaei SM¹ Show Affiliations
Source: Dental Research Journal Published:2016

Abstract

Background: Several grafting materials have been used for alveolar ridge augmentation. The literature lacks researches to compare CenoBone to other grafting materials. The aim of this study was to compare CenoBone/CenoMembrane complex to Bio-Oss/Bio-Gide complex in lateral alveolar bone augmentation in terms of radiographic, histologic, and histomorphometric parameters. Materials and Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, ten patients who needed lateral ridge augmentation were selected and augmentations were done using either of CenoBone/ CenoMembrane or Bio-Oss/Bio-Gide complexes. In the re-entry surgery in 6 months following augmentation, core biopsies were taken and clinical, radiographic, histologic, and histomorphometric evaluations were performed. Results: No statistically significant difference was seen between groups except for the number of blood vessels and percentage of residual graft materials. Conclusion: CenoBone seems to present a comparable lateral ridge augmentation to Bio-Oss in. © 2016 Dental Research Journal | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow.