Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Developing and Validating an Instrument to Measure: The Medical Professionalism Climate in Clinical Settings Publisher



Asghari F1 ; Shahvari Z2 ; Ebadi A3 ; Alipour F4 ; Samadi S5 ; Bahreini M6 ; Amini H7
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Medical Ethics and History of Medicine Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. School of Nursing and Midwifery, Islamic Azad University of Ghachsaran, Ghachsaran, Iran
  3. 3. Behavioral Sciences Research Center, Life style institute, Nursing Faculty, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  4. 4. Eye Research Center, Farabi Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  5. 5. Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  6. 6. Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  7. 7. Department of Psychiatry, Roozbeh Hospital, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Source: Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine Published:2021


Abstract

This study was conducted to develop and validate an instrument to measure the medical professionalism climate in clinical settings. The item pool was developed based on the Tehran University of Medical Sciences Guideline for Professional Conduct. The items were distributed between two questionnaires, one for health-care providers and the other for patients. To assess the construct validity of the questionnaires, 350 health-care providers and 88 patients were enrolled in the study. The reliability of the questionnaires was evaluated by calculating Cronbach’s alpha and ICC. At first a 74-item pool was generated. After assessing and confirming face and content validity, 41 items remained in the final version of the scale. Exploratory factor analysis revealed the three factors of “personal behavior”, “collegiality” and “respect for patient autonomy” in a 25-item questionnaire for service providers and a single factor of “professional behavior” in a 6-item questionnaire for patients. The three factors explained 51.775% of the variance for service providers’ questionnaire and the single is factor explained 63.9% of the variance for patients’ questionnaire. The findings demonstrated that from the viewpoints of patients and service providers, this instrument could be applied to assess the medical professionalism climate in hospital clinical settings. © 2021 Tehran University of Medical Sciences.
Related Docs
1. Medical Students’ Perception of Professionalism Climate in Clinical Settings, Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine (2021)
3. How to Give Feedback on Professionalism in Clinical Education: A Narrative Review, Strides in Development of Medical Education Journal (2023)
4. Professionalism in Anesthesiology; a Qualitative Meta-Synthesis, Journal of Iranian Medical Council (2022)
Experts (# of related papers)