Diagnostic Value of [68Ga]Ga-Pentixafor Pet/Ct in Malignant Melanoma: A Pilot Study Publisher Pubmed



Manafifarid R¹ ; Mahini M¹ ; Mirshahvalad SA¹ ; Fallahi B¹ ; Fardesfahani A¹ ; Emamiardekani A¹ ; Eftekhari M¹ ; Mousavi SA² ; Beiki D¹ Show Affiliations
Source: Nuclear Medicine Communications Published:2024

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the diagnostic value of [68Ga] Ga-Pentixafor in malignant melanoma patients. Methods In this prospective study, patients with histology-proven melanoma were included and underwent [18F]fluoro-D-glucose ([18F]FDG) and [68Ga] Ga-Pentixafor PET/computed tomography (CT) within a week. Suspicious lesions were interpreted as benign vs. malignant, and the corresponding semi-quantitative PET/CT parameters were recorded and compared. Results Twelve consecutive melanoma patients (mean age: 60 ± 6) were included. Two patients were referred for initial staging, two for detecting recurrence and eight for evaluating the extent of metastases. Overall, [18F]FDG PET/CT showed 236 tumoral lesions, including two primary tumors, two recurrent lesions, 29 locoregional metastases and 203 distant metastases. In [68Ga]Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT, 101 tumoral lesions were detected, including two primary tumors, one recurrence, 16 locoregional metastases and 82 distant metastases. Notably, a documented brain metastasis was only visualized on [68Ga]Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT images. Compared with [18F]FDG, [68Ga]Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT provided a 42% detection rate. Regarding semi-quantitative measures, the intensity of uptake and tumor-to-background ratios were significantly lower on [68Ga]Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT [average maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) of 2.72 ± 1.33 vs. 11.41 ± 14.79; P value <0.001 and 1.17 ± 0.53 vs. 5.32 ± 7.34; P value <0.001, respectively]. Conclusion When comparing [68Ga]Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT with [18F]FDG PET/CT, not only did [68Ga]Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT detect fewer lesions, but the intensity of uptake and the TBRs were also lower on [68Ga]Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT. Thus, our results may indicate a limited potential of this novel tracer in cutaneous melanoma patients compared to [18F]FDG PET/CT. Given the lower TBRs, applying this radiotracer in radioligand therapies is also questionable. © 2024 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.