Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Generative Adversarial Networks for Anomaly Detection in Biomedical Imaging: A Study on Seven Medical Image Datasets Publisher



Esmaeili M1, 2 ; Toosi A3 ; Roshanpoor A4 ; Changizi V5 ; Ghazisaeedi M1 ; Rahmim A3, 6 ; Sabokrou M2
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Tehran University of Medical Sciences, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Department of Health Information Management, Tehran, 14177-44361, Iran
  2. 2. Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences (IPM), School of Computer Science, Tehran, 19538-33511, Iran
  3. 3. Bc Cancer Research Institute, Department of Integrative Oncology, Vancouver, V5Z 1L3, BC, Canada
  4. 4. Yadegar-e-Imam Khomeini, Janat-Abad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Department of Computer, Tehran, 14779-99651, Iran
  5. 5. Tehran University of Medical Sciences, School of Allied Health Sciences, Department of Radiology and Radiotherapy Technology, Tehran, 14177-44361, Iran
  6. 6. The University of British Columbia, Departments of Radiology and Physics, Vancouver, V6T 1Z4, BC, Canada

Source: IEEE Access Published:2023


Abstract

Anomaly detection (AD) is a challenging problem in computer vision. Particularly in the field of medical imaging, AD poses even more challenges due to a number of reasons, including insufficient availability of ground truth (annotated) data. In recent years, AD models based on generative adversarial networks (GANs) have made significant progress. However, their effectiveness in biomedical imaging remains underexplored. In this paper, we present an overview of using GANs for AD, as well as an investigation of state-of-the-art GAN-based AD methods for biomedical imaging and the challenges encountered in detail. We have also specifically investigated the advantages and limitations of AD methods on medical image datasets, conducting experiments using 3 AD methods on 7 medical imaging datasets from different modalities and organs/tissues. Given the highly different findings achieved across these experiments, we further analyzed the results from both data-centric and model-centric points of view. The results showed that none of the methods had a reliable performance for detecting abnormalities in medical images. Factors such as the number of training samples, the subtlety of the anomaly, and the dispersion of the anomaly in the images are among the phenomena that highly impact the performance of the AD models. The obtained results were highly variable (AUC: 0.475-0.991; Sensitivity: 0.17-0.98; Specificity: 0.14-0.97). In addition, we provide recommendations for the deployment of AD models in medical imaging and foresee important research directions. © 2013 IEEE.