Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Implementing a Localized Health Promotion Model in Diabetic Patients: A Field Trial Publisher



Tarjoman T1 ; Mohammadi M2 ; Mousavi F3 ; Chouhdari A1 ; Nikpajouh A4 ; Alimohammadzadeh K5, 6 ; Shojaei P3 ; Shafiee A7
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Amir-al-Momenin Hospital, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Department of Community & Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
  4. 4. Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  5. 5. Economics Policy Research Center, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
  6. 6. Department of Health Services Management, North Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
  7. 7. Cardiac Primary Prevention Research Center, Cardiovascular Diseases Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Source: Journal of Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders Published:2025


Abstract

Objectives: Diabetes mellitus, a major cardiovascular risk factor, is a leading non-communicable disease globally. Self-management education can effectively prevent and control diabetes. We evaluated a localized health promotion model for diabetic patients through a field trial in a general hospital. Methods: We enrolled 452 diabetic patients who visited our hospital’s cardiology and internal medicine wards and randomly assigned them to two equal groups: intervention and control. The intervention group received initial and periodic education on diabetes management and lifestyle modification, as well as educational materials. The control group received only initial education and phone follow-ups. We measured the following outcomes after 6 and 12 months of discharge: glucose and lipid levels, smoking status, diet quality, rehospitalization rate, treatment cost, quality of life, and work absenteeism. The groups were then compared using chi-square, student t-test, and two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance. Results: We enrolled 452 patients, randomized into two equal groups, and followed them for one year. Baseline demographic and clinical variables were similar between groups. The intervention group showed a significant reduction in BMI (P = 0.027), fasting blood glucose (P < 0.001), and HbA1c levels (P = 0.002) compared to the control group. The prevalence of hypertension, smoking, sedentary lifestyle, and inappropriate diet was significantly higher in the control group (P = 0.001 for all). The intervention group had fewer hospitalizations, work absences, and medical costs (P < 0.001, P = 0.001, and P < 0.001, respectively). No significant difference was observed in satisfaction rates between the groups. Conclusions: Health promotion interventions could improve glucose control and other health indicators and reduce costs for diabetic patients. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2025.
Related Docs
Experts (# of related papers)