Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Reevaluating the Role of Heparin During Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Increased Risks Without Functional Benefit Publisher Pubmed



Jazayeri SB1, 2 ; Ghozy S2, 3 ; Saha R4 ; Gajjar A5 ; Elfil M6 ; Kallmes DF2
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
  3. 3. Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
  4. 4. Department of Neurology, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, United States
  5. 5. Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States
  6. 6. Department of Neurological Sciences, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States

Source: Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery Published:2024


Abstract

Background: Heparin may be administered during mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusions (AIS-LVO), with the aim of enhancing reperfusion and improving patient outcomes. The uncertain balance between risks and benefits of administering heparin during MT prompted us to perform this systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Scopus to find studies that report the safety or efficacy of administering heparin during MT for AIS-LVO. Meta-analysis was performed using the random effects model. In case of significant heterogeneity a subgroup analysis was performed. Results: From 2398 screened records, we included 15 studies. Rate of favorable functional outcome (90 day modified Rankin Scale 0–2 (mRS 0–2)) was lower among patients who received heparin (OR, 0.88 [95 %CI 0.79–0.98]; p=.023). Risk of distal embolization was higher in patients who received heparin (OR, 1.25 [95 %CI 1.01–1.55]; p=.04). The subgroup analysis showed that patients who received intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) had higher risk of Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) (OR, 2.94 [95 %CI 1.30–6.63]; p=.009) and lower rate of mRS 0–2 (OR, 0.66 [95 %CI 0.50–0.87]; p=.004). Heparin use didn't affect successful reperfusion rate (Thrombolysis in cerebral infarction ≥2B), mortality or any ICH risk. Conclusion: Overall, our analysis indicates that administering heparin during MT for AIS-LVO correlates with worse clinical outcomes and increased distal embolization rates. Moreover, it is linked to a higher risk of sICH in patients who receive IVT. Consequently, the routine utilization of heparin during MT should be reconsidered. © 2024 Elsevier B.V.
Experts (# of related papers)
Other Related Docs
23. Low-Dose Whole Lung Irradiation for Treatment of Covid-19 Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics (2022)