Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
A Study on Determination of Theophylline in Plasma and Urine Sample Using Electromembrane Extraction Combined With High-Performance Liquid Chromatography–Ultraviolet Publisher



Dolatabadi R1 ; Zaheri M1 ; Ebrahimi S1 ; Mohammadi A1, 2
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Drug and Food Control, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Nanotechnology Research Center, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Source: Chemical Papers Published:2022


Abstract

The main focus of this study is to introduce and validate an electromembrane extraction (EME) method along with HPLC–UV analysis to determine theophylline in the plasma and urine. The main parameters affecting the extraction process such as type of supported liquid membrane organic solvent, donor and acceptor pH, extraction time and voltage were examined. Under optimal conditions, theophylline was extracted from the sample solution at pH = 9 to the acceptor solution at pH = 13, and as the extraction driving force, a voltage of 50 V was used for 10 min. Considering the main phenomena in EME, a computational model was used to predict the recovery ratio of EME systems. At this voltage and extraction time, the simulation was performed for various pH of the sample and acceptor solutions. Results revealed that the optimum working condition was computed to be when the sample and acceptor solution pH is around 9.5–10 and, 12.5–13, respectively, which are in acceptable agreement with experimental results. Under these conditions, the calibration curve is linear in the range of 50–500 ng/ml with a relative standard deviation of less than 7.0%. The limit of detection and limit of quantitation were 15 and 50 ng/ml, respectively. The enrichment factor and extraction recovery calculated for this method were 42 and 28%, respectively. The developed method was used for the plasma and urine with relative recovery of 95.1% and 69.2%, respectively. Moreover, the relative standard deviation of the biological samples was 4.4% and 3.9% for the plasma and urine, respectively. © 2021, Institute of Chemistry, Slovak Academy of Sciences.