Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Differences and Agreement Between Two Portable Hand-Held Spirometers Across Diverse Community-Based Populations in the Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (Pure) Study Publisher



Duong M1 ; Rangarajan S1 ; Zaman M1 ; Nasir NM2 ; Seron P3 ; Yeates K4 ; Yusufali AM5 ; Khatib R6 ; Tse LA7 ; Wang C8 ; Wielgosz A9 ; Teo K1 ; Kumar R10 ; Avezum A11 Show All Authors
Authors
  1. Duong M1
  2. Rangarajan S1
  3. Zaman M1
  4. Nasir NM2
  5. Seron P3
  6. Yeates K4
  7. Yusufali AM5
  8. Khatib R6
  9. Tse LA7
  10. Wang C8
  11. Wielgosz A9
  12. Teo K1
  13. Kumar R10
  14. Avezum A11
  15. Ismail R12
  16. Calik BT13
  17. Gopakumar S14
  18. Rahman O15
  19. Zatonska K16
  20. Rosengren A17
  21. Otero J18
  22. Kelishadi R19
  23. Diaz R20
  24. Puoane T21
  25. Yusuf S1
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Medicine, Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada
  2. 2. Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Sungai Buloh Campus Selangor, Malaysia
  3. 3. Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile
  4. 4. Pamoja Tunaweza Research Centre, Moshi, Tanzania
  5. 5. Dubai Medical University, Hatta Hospital, Dubai Health Authority, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
  6. 6. Advocate Aurora Research Institute, IL, Milwaukee, United States
  7. 7. JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Shatin, Hong Kong
  8. 8. Medical Research & Biometrics Center, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical, Beijing, China
  9. 9. University of Ottawa, Department of Medicine, Ottawa, ON, Canada
  10. 10. State Health System Resource Center, Punjab, India
  11. 11. International Research Center, Hospital Alemao Oswaldo Cruz, SP, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  12. 12. Community Health Department, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  13. 13. Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Health Management, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey
  14. 14. Health Action by People and Government Medical College, Kerala, Thiruvananthapuram, India
  15. 15. University of Liberal Arts Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  16. 16. Wroclaw Medical University Bujwida, Wroclaw, Poland
  17. 17. University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
  18. 18. Instituto Masira, Universidad de Santander (UDES), Bucaramanga, Colombia
  19. 19. Cardiovascular Research Institute, Chamran Hospital, Isfahan, Iran
  20. 20. Estudios Clinicos Latinoamerica ECLA Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina
  21. 21. University of the Western Cape, School of Public Health, Cape Town, South Africa

Source: PLOS Global Public Health Published:2022


Abstract

Introduction Portable spirometers are commonly used in longitudinal epidemiological studies to measure and track the forced expiratory volume in first second (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC). During the course of the study, it may be necessary to replace spirometers with a different model. This raise questions regarding the comparability of measurements from different devices. We examined the correlation, mean differences and agreement between two different spirometers, across diverse populations and different participant characteristics. Methods From June 2015 to Jan 2018, a total of 4,603 adults were enrolled from 628 communities in 18 countries and 7 regions of the world. Each participant performed concurrent measurements from the MicroGP and EasyOne spirometer. Measurements were compared by the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman method. Results Approximately 65% of the participants achieved clinically acceptable quality measurements. Overall correlations between paired FEV1 (ICC 0.88 [95% CI 0.87, 0.88]) and FVC (ICC 0.84 [0.83, 0.85]) were high. Mean differences between paired FEV1 (-0.038 L [-0.053, -0.023]) and FVC (0.033 L [0.012, 0.054]) were small. The 95% limits of agreement were wide but unbiased (FEV1 984, -1060; FVC 1460, -1394). Similar findings were observed across regions. The source of variation between spirometers was mainly at the participant level. Older age, higher body mass index, tobacco smoking and known COPD/asthma did not adversely impact on the inter-device variability. Furthermore, there were small and acceptable mean differences between paired FEV1 and FVC z-scores using the Global Lung Initiative normative values, suggesting minimal impact on lung function interpretation. Conclusions In this multicenter, diverse community-based cohort study, measurements from two portable spirometers provided good correlation, small and unbiased differences between measurements. These data support their interchangeable use across diverse populations to provide accurate trends in serial lung function measurements in epidemiological studies. © 2022 Duong et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Experts (# of related papers)
Other Related Docs