Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Keratoconus Classification Publisher



Ghoreishi M1, 2 ; Eslampoor A3
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Iran
  2. 2. Parsian Vision Research Institute, Isfahan, Iran
  3. 3. Eye Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

Source: Keratoconus: Optical and Surgical Management Published:2024


Abstract

Keratoconus classification has evolved over the past decades due to significant advancements in the diagnostic and management approaches. In the past, the path to keratoconus management was mainly limited to the advanced forms of the disease with typical clinical findings (Vogt's striae, Munson's sign, hydrops, etc.) and significant visual loss. The need to recognize more subtle or subclinical forms of the disease was neither appreciated nor needed because of the lack of effective modalities for halting progression or treating at the early stage, except for optical correction.1 This chapter reviews different classification systems currently available for assessing keratoconus severity based on historical and newer perspectives and tries to propose a new approach to classifying subclinical or suspect forms of the disease. © 2025 selection and editorial matter, Mehrdad Mohammadpour and Masoud Khorrami-Nejad; individual chapters, the contributors.
Other Related Docs
10. Correlation Between Corneal Thickness and Degree of Myopic Refractory Error, Journal of Research in Medical Sciences (2005)
13. Iolmaster Versus Manual Keratometry After Photorefractive Keratectomy, Journal of Ophthalmic and Vision Research (2011)
16. In Vivo Quantification of Bacterial Keratitis With Optical Coherence Tomography, Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science (2011)
23. Comparison of Different Invasive Types of Refractive Errors Operation, Journal of Isfahan Medical School (2007)