Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
A Multicentre Cross-Sectional Study of Arm Lymphedema Four or More Years After Breast Cancer Treatment in Iranian Patients Publisher Pubmed



Haddad P1 ; Farzin M1 ; Amouzegarhashemi F1 ; Kalaghchi B1 ; Babazadeh S2 ; Mirzaei HR3 ; Mousavizadeh A3 ; Harirchi I4 ; Rafat J5
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, P.O. Box 13145-158, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, Seyedoshohada Hospital, Esfahan University of Medical Sciences, Esfahan, Iran
  3. 3. Department of Radiation Oncology, Shohada-Tajrish Hospital, Shahid-Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  4. 4. Department of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  5. 5. Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Source: Breast Cancer Published:2010


Abstract

Background: We performed a cross-sectional multicentre study to assess the prevalence of lymphedema after breast cancer treatment in Iran. Patients and methods: All female breast cancer patients who attended our follow-up clinics four or more years after their surgery with no sign of disease were asked to participate in this study. Lymphedema was defined as an increase of 10% in the circumference of the arm on the involved side compared to the opposite arm. Results: The total number of patients participating in this study was 355. The prevalence of lymphedema in the study patients was 17.5%, with the rate varying significantly (between 4 and 21%) among the three study centres (p = 0.007). The mean number of months post surgery was larger for patients with lymphedema (84 months) than for those without (79 months), though this was not statistically significant (p > 0.1). The relationships of various treatment factors and the education levels of the patients to the presence of lymphedema were also evaluated. None of the observed differences were statistically significant aside from those for the type of surgery (mastectomy vs. conservative surgery, p = 0.055), treatment with radiotherapy (p = 0.099), and prescription of a supraclavicular radiation field (p = 0.057), which were only just significant. Conclusion: The rate of lymphedema in our patients was 17.5%, ranging from 4 to 21% in different study centres. Time post surgery, treatment with radiotherapy and the technique used, and nodal radiation seem to be factors that are related to this large variation. © 2009 The Japanese Breast Cancer Society.