Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
The Comparison of Procedural and Clinical Outcomes of Thrombolytic-Facilitated and Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Acute St-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (Stemi): Findings From Prove/Acs Study Publisher



Soleimani M1 ; Soleimani A2 ; Roohafza H1 ; Taheri M1 ; Yadegarfar G3 ; Azarm M1 ; Dorostkar N4 ; Vakili H1 ; Sadeghi M2
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  2. 2. Cardiac Rehabilitation Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  3. 3. Heart Failure Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  4. 4. Interventional Cardiology Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Source: ARYA Atherosclerosis Published:2020


Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is still a controversy in the preferred method of reperfusion in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), when the achievement of well-defined golden time is difficult. We sought to evaluate the procedural and in-hospital outcomes of the strategy of thrombolytic administration and rescue or routine percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus primary PCI (PPCI) strategy in acute STEMI. METHODS: In this observational prospective study, the data of 237 patients with acute STEMI presented or referred to Chamran Cardiovascular Research Center in Isfahan, Iran, were collected (SEMI-CI study). Baseline characteristics, thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade of infarct-related artery (IRA), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and in-hospital outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 61.4 ± 13.0 years, 86.9% were men, 13.1% were diabetic, and 67.9% had anterior STEMI. Patients in the thrombolytic then PCI group were younger, more smoker, more often male with higher body weight and lower systolic blood pressure (SBP). The pre-PCI TIMI flow grade 3 was more often seen in the thrombolytic then PCI group (39.4% vs. 21.0%, P < 0.001) and less thrombectomy was performed in this group of patients (12.9% vs. 26.7%, P = 0.011). Time to reperfusion was significantly longer in PPCI group (182.4 ± 233.7 minutes vs. 44.6 ± 93.4 minutes, respectively, P < 0.001). No difference in mortality, mean of LVEF, and incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) was observed in two groups. CONCLUSION: If the PPCI strategy could not be performed in the golden time, the strategy of thrombolytic administration and rescue or routine PCI leads to more initial IRA patency and less thrombectomy with similar clinical outcomes. © 2020, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences(IUMS). All rights reserved.
Experts (# of related papers)
Other Related Docs