Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
The Assessment of No-Reflow Phenomenon Incidence in Early Versus Delayed Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Following a Primary Fibrinolysis Publisher



Amirpour A1 ; Behjati MA2 ; Zavar R3 ; Shirvani E2 ; Zarepour E4 ; Hassannejad R4 ; Sadeghi M1 ; Poodeh RJ3 ; Safaei A3 ; Sanaei S5 ; Parvar NM6
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Cardiac Rehabilitation Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  2. 2. Interventional Cardiology Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  3. 3. Chamran Cardiovascular Medical and Research Hospital, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  4. 4. Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  5. 5. Department of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  6. 6. Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States

Source: ARYA Atherosclerosis Published:2024


Abstract

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the gold standard approach to ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI). Fibrinolysis followed by PCI has been recommended. The current study aims to investigate the no-reflow phenomenon incidence in patients undergoing post-thrombolytic therapy PCI. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 250 patients with STEMI who primarily received fibrinolytic therapy followed by early (3-24 hours) (n=231) or delayed (> 24 hours) (n=19) PCI. They were also subcategorized into four intervals: <6 hours (n=98), 6-12 hours (n=93), 12-24 hours (n=38), and ≥24 hours (n=21). The demographic and medical data of the patients were retrieved. The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction score (TIMI) was assessed at baseline and at the end of PCI. A TIMI score other than 3 was defined as no-reflow. RESULTS: The incidence of the no-reflow phenomenon was not associated with any of the underlying demographic and medical characteristics of the patients (P-value>0.05). Despite the significantly higher rate of improvement in TIMI grading among those undergoing early PCI (P-value=0.04), as well as within less than 6 hours after thrombolytic therapy (P-value=0.031), the rate of the no-reflow phenomenon did not differ between the groups, neither by sorting them as early versus delayed (P-value=0.518) nor by categorizing them into four intervals (P-value=0.367). CONCLUSION: Based on the findings of the current study, early PCI after fibrinolysis led to significantly improved TIMI flow. However, the incidence of no-reflow did not differ between the groups with early versus delayed post-fibrinolysis PCI. © 2024, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences(IUMS). All rights reserved.
Experts (# of related papers)
Other Related Docs
41. Reteplase: Structure, Function, and Production, Advanced Biomedical Research (2019)